Telangana HC seeks police report on IPS trainee harassment case
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Telangana High Court on Wednesday, 22 July directed police to furnish details of the case registered against trainee Indian Police Service (IPS) officer M. Uday Krishna Reddy, who faces allegations of sexually harassing a woman batchmate at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel National Police Academy (SVPNPA) in Hyderabad. The court adjourned the hearing to Monday, 27 July, while also rejecting Reddy's plea to restrain police from taking any action against him in the interim.
What the Court Directed
Reddy had filed a petition seeking to quash the First Information Report (FIR) lodged against him, claiming the allegations were false. The High Court declined to grant any interim protection, refusing his counsel's request to stay police action until the next date of hearing. The matter will now be taken up on 27 July, when police are expected to place the case details on record.
The Allegations Against Reddy
A 30-year-old woman trainee officer alleged that Reddy harassed her between 23 June and 10 July while both were undergoing training at the academy. According to her complaint, he sent abusive messages, subjected her to criminal intimidation, recorded a private video and forwarded it to her husband, forcibly took her mobile phone to his room, compelled her to reveal its password, and blackmailed her into disclosing personal messages.
Based on the complaint, Attapur police registered a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) — including Section 74 (criminal force against a woman), Section 75 (sexual harassment), Section 77 (voyeurism), Section 78 (stalking), Section 79 (insulting the modesty of a woman), Section 127(2) (wrongful confinement), Section 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), and Section 351(2) (criminal intimidation) — along with Section 66E (violation of privacy) and Section 67A (transmission of sexually explicit material) of the Information Technology Act.
The Alleged Suicide Attempt
Reddy had allegedly attempted suicide at a relative's residence in Hyderabad on 21 July and was subsequently admitted to a private hospital. Body samples sent for examination tested negative for poison and drugs; the findings reportedly indicated only an overdose of alcohol, with investigators suspecting he lost consciousness due to excessive alcohol consumption.
In a purported handwritten note recovered from the scene, Reddy claimed he and the woman trainee officer had been in a relationship since June 2025 and that they had remained physically and emotionally involved even after her marriage. He named four individuals — including the woman and her husband — holding them responsible for his decision. He denied all allegations of force or coercion and claimed to possess photographic and video evidence that, according to him, establishes the relationship was consensual.
What Happens Next
The High Court's direction to submit case details signals judicial scrutiny of both the FIR and the circumstances surrounding it. With Reddy's quash petition still pending and police yet to file their response, the 27 July hearing will be a critical juncture. The case has drawn attention to conduct standards at the country's premier police training institution, raising questions about internal grievance mechanisms at the SVPNPA.