VHP slams Digvijaya Singh over RSS land claim near Mahakal Temple

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
VHP slams Digvijaya Singh over RSS land claim near Mahakal Temple

Synopsis

Digvijaya Singh's double-barrelled attack — alleging RSS land misuse near the Mahakal Temple and threatening a court case over his own Ram Temple donation — has drawn a fierce VHP counter-offensive. With Surendra Jain invoking a 500-year struggle and Alok Kumar flatly denying RSS land ownership outside Nagpur, the row signals a fresh front in the Congress-VHP political battle ahead of key state cycles.

Key Takeaways

Digvijaya Singh alleged that land near the Mahakal Temple in Ujjain was allotted to an RSS -linked trust under former CM Sunderlal Patwa and is being used for a 100-room hotel .
VHP International President Alok Kumar called Singh's claims 'highly irresponsible' and said the RSS owns no land outside its Nagpur headquarters.
VHP General Secretary Surendra Jain accused Singh of lacking 'moral authority' and invoked the 500-year Ram Janmabhoomi struggle in his rebuttal.
Singh announced plans to file a lawsuit in Ayodhya seeking the return of ₹1.11 lakh he donated to the Ram Temple Trust , alleging misappropriation.
Singh said he donated directly to the Ram Temple Trust after the 2019 Supreme Court judgment and had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the funds.

Senior Congress leader and former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh has alleged that valuable land near the Mahakal Temple in Ujjain was allotted to a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-linked trust during the tenure of former Chief Minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Sunderlal Patwa, and is now being used for commercial purposes. The claim drew a sharp rebuttal from the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) on Saturday, 4 July, with its International President calling Singh's pattern of such allegations a 'highly irresponsible' habit.

VHP's Rebuttal

VHP International President Alok Kumar dismissed the allegation outright, saying he was unaware of the specifics but was confident the claim could not be true. 'Digvijaya Singh has always been in the habit of making highly irresponsible statements. This allegation is a new one. I am not aware of the facts of this particular matter, but I do not believe the allegation can be true because the nature and character of the RSS are not like that,' Kumar said. He added, 'The RSS does not own land across the country, except for its headquarters in Nagpur. The RSS does not own buildings throughout India.'

What Digvijaya Singh Alleged

Singh claimed that the land near the Mahakal Temple — reportedly of significant commercial value — was allotted to an RSS-linked trust under the Patwa government and is now being used for the construction of a 100-room hotel, among other commercial activities. He demanded a formal inquiry into what he described as the alleged misuse of donations. Separately, Singh announced on Friday that he would file a lawsuit in a court in Ayodhya seeking the return of ₹1.11 lakh he had donated for the construction of the Ram Temple, alleging that the funds had been misappropriated.

Singh's Ram Temple Donation Row

Addressing an event organised by the Madhya Pradesh Mahila Congress in Bhopal, Singh said he would approach the court rather than the police. 'I have decided to file a lawsuit in Ayodhya saying that the donation I made was misappropriated. They looted it, and therefore it should be returned to me so that I can deposit it into the Ramlaya Trust. I have no faith in the police because they are controlled by the BJP, so I will not go to the police station. I will go to the court in Ayodhya,' he said. Singh added that he had donated ₹1.11 lakh directly to the Ram Temple Trust following the 2019 Supreme Court judgment, choosing not to contribute through the VHP as he said he did not trust the organisation. He also stated that he had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting the donation be deposited with the Ram Temple Trust, and had received an official receipt after making the contribution.

VHP General Secretary's Counter-Attack

VHP General Secretary Surendra Jain went further, invoking the Ram Janmabhoomi movement in his criticism. 'The Hindu community has fought this battle for 500 years. It also fought against people like you who, according to us, stood with the British,' Jain said, addressing Singh directly. He argued that Congress and leaders like Singh would 'never have allowed the temple to be built,' and said the VHP took up the movement in 1984 under the leadership of saints for precisely that reason. Jain also said, 'Those who have a history of misusing donations, looting the country, and patronising anti-Hindu elements have no moral authority to make such allegations,' adding that Singh, as Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, had previously blocked a VHP conference on internal security.

Political Context

This confrontation is the latest in a long-running pattern of friction between Singh and Hindu nationalist organisations. The allegations arrive at a politically charged moment, with the Ram Temple and its associated trust under heightened public scrutiny. Whether Singh's threatened lawsuit in Ayodhya materialises — and what it reveals about the management of temple donations — will be closely watched in the weeks ahead.

Point of View

Not spontaneous outrage. The VHP's response, while predictably sharp, sidesteps the substantive question: who actually holds the land near the Mahakal Temple and on what terms. Kumar's blanket denial of RSS land ownership outside Nagpur does not address the trust structure Singh is pointing to. Meanwhile, Singh's decision to sue in Ayodhya rather than file a police complaint is legally unusual and politically transparent — it keeps the Ram Temple finances in the headlines without requiring him to prove misappropriation in a forum where evidence would be tested. The real accountability gap here is the absence of any independent audit of Ram Temple Trust donations, a lacuna that both sides are exploiting rather than closing.
NationPress
4 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Digvijaya Singh allege about the RSS and the Mahakal Temple land?
Digvijaya Singh alleged that valuable land near the Mahakal Temple in Ujjain was allotted to an RSS-linked trust during the tenure of former BJP Chief Minister Sunderlal Patwa, and is now being used for commercial purposes including the construction of a 100-room hotel. He demanded a formal inquiry into the alleged misuse of donations.
How did the VHP respond to Digvijaya Singh's allegations?
VHP International President Alok Kumar dismissed the claims as 'highly irresponsible,' saying the RSS owns no land anywhere in India outside its Nagpur headquarters. VHP General Secretary Surendra Jain went further, accusing Singh of lacking moral authority and invoking the 500-year Ram Janmabhoomi struggle in his counter-attack.
Why is Digvijaya Singh filing a lawsuit in Ayodhya?
Singh announced he would sue in an Ayodhya court to recover ₹1.11 lakh he donated to the Ram Temple Trust after the 2019 Supreme Court judgment, alleging the funds were misappropriated. He said he chose the court over the police because he does not trust the police, whom he described as being under BJP control.
Who is Alok Kumar and what is his role in the VHP?
Alok Kumar is the International President of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), one of India's largest Hindu nationalist organisations. He is a senior figure in the Sangh Parivar and a frequent spokesperson on issues involving Hindu religious institutions and politics.
What is the background to the Ram Temple donation controversy?
Digvijaya Singh says he donated ₹1.11 lakh directly to the Ram Temple Trust following the Supreme Court's 2019 Ayodhya verdict, deliberately bypassing the VHP as he said he did not trust the organisation. He also claims to have written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting the funds be properly deposited, and says he received an official receipt.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 hours ago
  2. 21 hours ago
  3. Yesterday
  4. Yesterday
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 3 weeks ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google