Is Google Evaluating the CCI's Order Regarding Alleged Dominance in AdTech?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Google is reviewing CCI orders regarding its AdTech practices.
- The CCI has initiated a comprehensive investigation.
- Part of ADIF's complaint was dismissed as redundant.
- Google claims its practices benefit all stakeholders.
- Concerns have been raised about anti-competitive behavior.
New Delhi, Aug 3 (NationPress) Google announced on Sunday that it is currently assessing the orders issued by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) concerning its behavior in the online display advertising sector.
The regulatory body mandated an extensive investigation following a complaint lodged by the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF). The CCI has chosen to consolidate this complaint with ongoing inquiries into similar matters, instructing the Director General (DG) to conduct a comprehensive investigation into Google's actions within the AdTech ecosystem.
Separately, the CCI dismissed a complaint brought forth by ADIF against Google, determining that the claims had already been reviewed and resolved in prior cases. The regulator expressed skepticism about the rationale provided by ADIF for differentiating its claims from those previously addressed in earlier rulings.
“We are currently reviewing the CCI’s orders. We appreciate the CCI’s decision to reject one aspect of the complaint,” stated a spokesperson for Google.
“We remain assured that our ongoing collaboration with the CCI will demonstrate that Google's advertising practices have consistently benefited advertisers, publishers, and users, and are in complete alignment with competition laws,” the company further expressed.
ADIF accused Google in its complaint of engaging in anti-competitive practices at various levels of its advertising technology infrastructure.
Moreover, ADIF contended that Google, through its numerous affiliated entities, has participated in anti-competitive behavior by self-preferencing its own offerings within the AdTech ecosystem, including the tying and bundling of its publisher ad server (DFP) with its ad exchange (AdX), and associating access to YouTube ad inventory with the usage of its demand-side platform (DV360).
The CCI indicated that it was prima facie convinced that Google's actions warranted examination under Section 4 of the Competition Act, which addresses the abuse of a dominant position.