Piyush Goyal Blasts Congress Over Lopsided India–South Korea FTA Deal
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, April 23: Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Thursday launched a sharp attack on the Congress-led UPA II government, calling the India–South Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) — signed in 2009 and operationalised in 2010 — a poorly negotiated, imbalanced deal that systematically tilted trade outcomes against India. Goyal made the remarks via a detailed post on social media platform X, citing specific trade data to back his criticism.
Trade Deficit Widened Despite Rising Bilateral Commerce
According to Minister Goyal, bilateral merchandise trade between India and South Korea has grown by 92.7 per cent since the FTA came into force. However, the growth has been deeply asymmetric — India's imports from South Korea surged by 103.7 per cent, far outpacing India's export growth. The result: while total trade volumes expanded, India's trade deficit with South Korea widened considerably, raising serious questions about the original deal's architecture.
This data-backed critique is significant. Critics of the original UPA-era FTA have long argued that India entered several trade agreements during that period without adequate safeguards for domestic manufacturing — a pattern that has since drawn scrutiny from economists, industry bodies, and trade policy analysts alike.
Modi Government Moved to Renegotiate in 2015
Goyal noted that as early as 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the President of the Republic of Korea agreed to begin renegotiating the India–Korea Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IKCEPA), aiming for both qualitative and quantitative improvements in bilateral trade. A formal roadmap was drawn up, and ministerial-level joint committee meetings were convened to launch the renegotiation process.
Since then, eleven rounds of renegotiation talks have been completed, and an Early Harvest Package has been agreed upon. The two governments have now decided to push further — prioritising a more reciprocal and mutually beneficial framework, with a strong emphasis on key sectors of shared interest, addressing non-tariff barriers, and tightening rules of origin to prevent trade deflection.
The renegotiation is expected to conclude by end of 2026, or at the latest by mid-2027.
Localisation Push Begins to Yield Results
Beyond tariff restructuring, Goyal highlighted that sustained pressure on Korean companies operating in India to increase localisation and reduce import dependency is beginning to show tangible results. The minister said India is now witnessing genuine indigenisation and improved reciprocity from Korean industrial players — a shift that aligns with the broader Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat policy push.
This is a meaningful pivot. Earlier, Korean firms largely operated as wholly owned subsidiaries in India, repatriating profits while importing components. The new approach encourages joint ventures and technology transfer, deepening India's industrial base.
JSW–POSCO Joint Venture: A New Investment Template
A landmark announcement was made during the recent state visit of the President of the Republic of Korea to India: JSW Steel and South Korea's POSCO have formed a 50:50 joint venture to set up a 6 MTPA greenfield integrated steel plant in Odisha, with an estimated investment of Rs 35,000 crore. Goyal specifically underscored that this joint venture model marks a departure from earlier Korean investments, which were structured as wholly owned subsidiaries — a structure that offered fewer benefits to India's economy.
Multiple Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) have also been signed between the two nations, targeting bilateral cooperation across trade, industry, strategic resources, clean energy, MSME development, supply chain resilience, and industrial co-production.
Political Context and Broader Trade Policy Implications
Goyal's broadside against the India–South Korea FTA is part of a larger political and policy narrative: the BJP-led NDA government has consistently positioned itself as correcting the trade policy missteps of the Congress era. Notably, India has also been renegotiating its FTA with ASEAN — another agreement signed during the UPA period — citing similar concerns about import surges and inadequate protections for domestic industry.
This comes amid India's intensified focus on bilateral trade agreements, with active negotiations underway with the UK, EU, and GCC. The government's stated approach — ensuring fair trade, balanced outcomes, and protection of domestic manufacturing — signals a more assertive, interest-first posture in all future trade negotiations.
With renegotiation talks targeted for completion by mid-2027 and the JSW–POSCO steel plant poised to reshape industrial collaboration, the India–South Korea economic relationship is entering a structurally different phase — one that New Delhi hopes will finally tip the scales in India's favour.