Box-office Blues: What Went Wrong with ‘Ek Chatur Naar’, ‘Love in Vietnam’, and ‘Heer Express’?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Inadequate marketing led to low visibility for the films.
- Weak content contributed to their box-office failures.
- Audience engagement is crucial for success.
- Effective marketing can create necessary buzz.
- Strong storytelling is essential for positive word-of-mouth.
Mumbai, Sep 14 (NationPress) Not every Friday is a celebration at the box-office; some can be quite alarming for producers. This particular Friday marked the launch of several small films, including ‘Ek Chatur Naar’, ‘Love in Vietnam’, ‘Heer Express’, ‘Mannu Kya Karega’, and ‘Jugnuma - The Fable’. Unfortunately, all of them ended up being significant commercial failures.
Film industry analyst Girish Wankhede discussed the reasons for these films' lack of success in a conversation with IANS. Typically, smaller films struggle at the box-office when they compete against larger productions or blockbusters. However, when films of similar scale are released together and still fail to perform, it indicates an underlying issue.
According to Girish Wankhede, “These five films were a total flop at the box office. To illustrate, ‘Ek Chatur Naar’ made approximately INR 50 lacs, ‘Love in Vietnam’ earned INR 6 lacs, ‘Mannu Kya Karega’ reached INR 45 lacs, ‘Jugnuma’ grossed INR 5 lacs, and ‘Heer Express’ garnered INR 55 lacs. In many locations, screenings were even canceled due to a lack of audience.”
He attributed the films' poor performance to inadequate marketing strategies, indicating that they failed to create sufficient excitement to draw viewers to theaters.
He elaborated, “The primary issue is the absence of marketing for these films. There was no buzz, no visibility. If you ask an average person, they wouldn't even know that films like ‘Heer Express’ or ‘Jugnuma’ or ‘Ek Chatur Naar’ were released. Without effective marketing and visibility, how can we expect audiences to attend screenings?”
Additionally, he pointed out that the content of these films was also subpar, alongside their ineffective marketing strategies. Had the content been compelling, these films could have achieved better box-office performance.
He concluded, “Neither the content was robust nor the marketing effective. If the content had been strong, it would have received positive reviews. A powerful film typically spreads through word of mouth. But when both content and marketing are weak, failure is unavoidable.”