Did Vijay Deverakonda Make Derogatory Remarks Against Tribals?

Click to start listening
Did Vijay Deverakonda Make Derogatory Remarks Against Tribals?

Synopsis

Vijay Deverakonda finds himself embroiled in controversy after a complaint was filed against him for remarks made at a film event. The comments, deemed derogatory towards tribal communities, have sparked outrage and legal consequences. What led to this backlash, and how will Deverakonda respond? Read on for the full story.

Key Takeaways

  • Vijay Deverakonda faces legal issues due to controversial remarks.
  • The comments were made during a film event for “Retro”.
  • The remarks are perceived as derogatory towards tribal communities.
  • A complaint was lodged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.
  • Public figures need to be mindful of their statements.

Mumbai, June 22 (NationPress) The Tollywood sensation Vijay Deverakonda is facing legal troubles after a complaint was lodged against him under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by the Raidurgam police.

During a pre-release event for the film “Retro”, featuring Suriya, Vijay allegedly made comments deemed offensive towards tribal communities.

In reference to the unfortunate Pahalgham attack, Vijay stated, “The solution to what is happening in Kashmir is to educate them (terrorists) and ensure they don’t get brainwashed. What will they achieve? Kashmir belongs to India, and Kashmiris are ours. India doesn’t even need to attack Pakistan because Pakistanis themselves are fed up with their government and will attack them if this continues. Asalu 500 years back tribals kokkutunnatu, veelu buddi lekunda, minimum common sense lekunda chese panulu.” (They behave like tribals did 500 years ago, fighting without common sense).

His comments were perceived as derogatory by various tribal organizations.

According to a portion of the FIR, it stated, “Film Actor Shri Vijay Deverakonda, who participated in the pre-release event of the movie 'Retro' starring Hero Surya, made comments that hurt the sentiments of the tribals and seriously insulted them. He insulted their tribal community by saying that they had beaten them 500 years ago without any intelligence and without minimum common sense. Moreover, he made comments comparing them to Pakistani terrorists. These comments, perceived as racially offensive, were broadcast across multiple media platforms. The statement went viral through the Sithara Entertainment YouTube Channel, which has 8.63 lakh subscribers and over 99,000 views for the specific video.

It continued, “The remarks were viewed as a serious insult to the self-respect and dignity of the tribal community. Therefore, the complainant requested to take necessary action against Shri Vijay Deverakonda as per law.”

As of now, Vijay has not publicly responded to the complaint.

Point of View

I want to emphasize that the right to free speech must be balanced with sensitivity towards marginalized communities. The remarks attributed to Vijay Deverakonda, while perhaps unintended, highlight the need for public figures to be aware of their words and their impact. We stand by the principles of equality and respect for all.
NationPress
22/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the remarks made by Vijay Deverakonda?
Vijay Deverakonda made comments during a film event that were perceived as derogatory towards tribal communities, comparing their behavior to that of individuals from 500 years ago.
What legal action has been taken against him?
A complaint has been filed against Vijay under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by the Raidurgam police.
How did the comments become public?
The comments were broadcasted on multiple media platforms, including the Sithara Entertainment YouTube Channel, where they went viral.
Has Vijay Deverakonda responded to the allegations?
As of now, Vijay Deverakonda has not publicly responded to the complaint.
What are the implications of such remarks for public figures?
Public figures must be cautious with their words, as they can have significant social and legal implications, particularly regarding marginalized communities.