Ranveer Singh breaks silence on FWICE boycott over Don 3 exit
Synopsis
Ranveer Singh has broken his silence after FWICE issued a Non-Cooperation Directive against him over his reported exit from Don 3 — a departure that producers Farhan Akhtar and Ritesh Sidhwani claim cost them ₹45 crore in pre-production losses. His response: dignified restraint, not engagement. The federation, however, is keeping the door open.
Key Takeaways
FWICE issued a Non-Cooperation Directive (NCD) against Ranveer Singh over his reported exit from Don 3 .
Producers Farhan Akhtar and Ritesh Sidhwani alleged a pre-production loss of approximately ₹45 crore .
Ranveer's spokesperson said he holds the 'highest regard for the film fraternity' and chose silence out of 'dignity and mutual respect.' Ranveer reportedly told FWICE that the dispute was contractual and should be resolved through the 'appropriate legal forum.' FWICE stated it remains open to meeting Ranveer for an 'amicable and final resolution.'
Ranveer Singh has issued an official statement through his spokesperson after the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) announced a Non-Cooperation Directive (NCD) against him, saying he holds the film fraternity in the highest regard. The statement comes amid a growing dispute over the actor's reported last-minute exit from Don 3, which producers claim has cost them approximately ₹45 crore in pre-production losses.
What Ranveer's Spokesperson Said
Ranveer's official spokesperson released a statement asserting that the actor had deliberately chosen restraint throughout the controversy. 'Ranveer Singh holds the highest regard for the film fraternity and for everyone associated with the Don franchise. Throughout the recent developments surrounding Don 3, he has consciously chosen to maintain silence, believing that professional discussions and personal equations are best handled with dignity, maturity and mutual respect,' the statement read.
The spokesperson further added that Ranveer had 'never considered it necessary to respond publicly or contribute to conjecture,' and that his focus remains on his work and upcoming commitments. The statement also extended goodwill toward the franchise, saying he 'sincerely wishes the franchise continued success.'
The FWICE Non-Cooperation Directive
FWICE stated that it had sent Ranveer multiple notices before arriving at the decision to issue the NCD. According to the federation, Ranveer had responded to their communications by arguing that 'FWICE would not be the appropriate forum for the complainants to raise their grievances,' and that the issues were 'contractual in nature and would require adjudication before the appropriate legal forum.'
In its official statement, FWICE said: 'Considering the conduct displayed towards the Federation and the stakeholders associated with the project, the office bearers of FWTCE have resolved to issue a Non-Cooperation Directive (NCD) against Mr. Ranveer Singh.' The federation also left the door open for dialogue, stating it remains 'open to meeting with Mr. Ranveer Singh to hear his side of the matter.'
Producers Cite ₹45 Crore Loss
Producers Farhan Akhtar and Ritesh Sidhwani of Excel Entertainment had approached FWICE with a complaint alleging a loss of approximately ₹45 crore towards pre-production expenses for Don 3, which they claim Ranveer exited at the last minute. The scale of the alleged loss underscores how far advanced production preparations had been before the actor's departure.
What Happens Next
The NCD, if sustained, could restrict Ranveer's ability to work with FWICE-affiliated crew members across the Hindi film industry. However, FWICE's stated openness to an 'amicable and final resolution' suggests the matter could still be settled out of court. The dispute is likely to test the boundaries of how contractual exits in Bollywood are governed — a question that has rarely been adjudicated at this scale.
Point of View
A legal posture as much as a PR one. The ₹45 crore figure is striking: pre-production losses of that scale suggest Don 3 was well into casting, set design, and possibly shoot prep when the exit occurred. FWICE's NCD is a blunt instrument, but it is one of the few levers a workers' federation has against a bankable star. The real question is whether this dispute gets resolved in a boardroom or becomes a precedent-setting case for how Bollywood handles star exits from contracted projects — something the industry has long preferred to keep out of public forums.
NationPress
11 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did FWICE issue a Non-Cooperation Directive against Ranveer Singh?
FWICE issued the NCD after producers Farhan Akhtar and Ritesh Sidhwani complained that Ranveer Singh's last-minute exit from Don 3 caused them a loss of approximately ₹45 crore in pre-production costs. The federation said it had sent Ranveer multiple notices before taking this step.
What did Ranveer Singh say in his official statement?
Through his spokesperson, Ranveer said he holds the 'highest regard for the film fraternity' and had chosen silence out of a belief that professional matters should be handled with 'dignity, maturity and mutual respect.' He did not directly address the ₹45 crore claim.
What is a Non-Cooperation Directive (NCD) and what does it mean for Ranveer?
An NCD issued by FWICE can restrict an actor's ability to work with the federation's affiliated crew members across the Hindi film industry. It is one of the strongest actions a workers' body can take against a film professional, though it can be lifted if both parties reach a resolution.
How did Ranveer respond to FWICE's notices before the NCD?
According to FWICE, Ranveer responded to their communications by stating that the federation was not the appropriate forum for the grievances and that the dispute was contractual in nature, requiring adjudication before the appropriate legal authority.
Is there a possibility of an out-of-court settlement?
Yes. FWICE explicitly stated it remains open to meeting Ranveer Singh to hear his side and work toward an 'amicable and final resolution.' Ranveer's statement also struck a conciliatory tone, suggesting both sides may prefer a negotiated outcome.
