Is Tamil TV Actor T. Ravichandran Seeking Bail for Threatening Kamal Haasan?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- T. Ravichandran is seeking anticipatory bail from the Madras High Court.
- The case stems from an alleged death threat directed at Kamal Haasan.
- The controversy highlights the intersection of politics and media in Tamil Nadu.
- The High Court will further consider the case on August 20.
- Ravichandran claims his comments were not meant as a real threat.
Chennai, Aug 18 (NationPress) Television actor T. Ravichandran has turned to the Madras High Court to request anticipatory bail after the Central Crime Branch (CCB) of Chennai police filed a case against him for allegedly making a death threat towards Rajya Sabha member and Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM) founder Kamal Haasan.
On Monday, Justice G. Jayachandran listened to the plea and instructed the government advocate to gather information from the CCB before rescheduling the case for further discussion on Wednesday.
Ravichandran stated in court that the comments he made during a YouTube interview were “unintentional” and were not meant to be perceived as a genuine threat.
The issue arose when Haasan highlighted the significance of education as a means of social change at the 15th anniversary celebration of actor Suriya’s Agaram Foundation earlier this month.
He emphasized that education is the “only weapon” capable of dismantling what he termed as the shackles of Sanatana Dharma.
In response, Ravichandran reacted in an interview with a YouTube channel where he vehemently opposed Haasan’s remarks, warning that he would slit the MP’s throat if such statements persisted.
This declaration sparked widespread backlash and concern, prompting MNM vice-president and retired IPS officer A.G. Mourya to file a formal complaint with the Greater Chennai Police Commissioner on August 10.
The complaint was then transferred to the CCB, which proceeded to file a First Information Report (FIR) against the actor.
In his bail application, Ravichandran contended that the FIR was filed without a preliminary inquiry and claimed he was unaware of the specific crime number.
He further asserted that he had no real intention of harming Haasan, mentioning that he hails from a “respectable family background” and is willing to adhere to any conditions the court may impose while deliberating his bail request.
The High Court is set to revisit the matter on August 20 after receiving input from the police.