Why Did Sonali Bendre Condemn the Supreme Court’s Order to Remove Stray Dogs from Public Spaces?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Actress Sonali Bendre has taken a stand against the Supreme Court’s ruling to remove stray dogs from public spaces, advocating for a more compassionate approach to animal welfare. Her Instagram post highlights the essential roles these dogs play in communities, igniting a debate on the implications for stray animals.
Key Takeaways
- Sonali Bendre stands against the Supreme Court's order.
- The ruling mandates the removal of stray dogs from public areas.
- Concerns raised regarding the welfare of these animals.
- Calls for a more compassionate approach to animal welfare.
- Mixed reactions from the entertainment industry.
Mumbai, Nov 21 (NationPress) Actress Sonali Bendre has expressed her strong criticism of the recent ruling by the Supreme Court that mandates the removal of stray dogs from public areas.
She raised concerns regarding the implications of such a decision, advocating for a more empathetic and humane strategy in dealing with the challenges posed by stray animals. In a recent Instagram post, Sonali emphasized the positive contributions of stray dogs within their communities, stating that these animals provide protection, companionship, and loyalty without asking for anything in return.
The ‘Hum Saath Saath Hain’ star also highlighted that the Supreme Court’s “blanket decision” could adversely affect all dogs residing on the streets, regardless of their temperament. Alongside a collection of photos, she remarked, “They protect, provide company and do not demand anything in return. A blanket decision like this negatively impacts every life on the street, friendly or not.”
One of the images she shared had text stating, “We have been jailed! What’s happening? The Supreme Court now permits the removal of stray dogs from essential public locations, including schools, hospitals, stations, and government buildings. Once taken, they are relocated to shelters and cannot return to their original spots.”
On November 7, the Supreme Court instructed all States and Union Territories to promptly remove stray dogs from areas such as schools, hospitals, sports complexes, bus stands, depots, and railway stations. The court mandated that the animals be sterilized and vaccinated in accordance with the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, prior to being moved to designated shelters.
The Supreme Court’s recent directive regarding the relocation of stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR area to shelters has triggered mixed reactions from the entertainment sector. While certain celebrities deem the action necessary for safety, numerous others contend that it contravenes the principles of animal welfare.
Point of View
It's our duty to present a balanced perspective on this contentious issue. While the Supreme Court's ruling aims to enhance public safety, it's imperative to weigh the ethical considerations of animal welfare. Stray dogs are an integral part of our urban environments, and any measures taken should prioritize both public safety and humane treatment of animals.
NationPress
21/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Supreme Court's order regarding stray dogs?
The Supreme Court has ordered the immediate removal of stray dogs from public places such as schools, hospitals, and transport terminals, mandating their sterilization and vaccination before relocation.
Why did Sonali Bendre criticize the ruling?
Sonali Bendre criticized the ruling for its potential to harm all stray dogs, regardless of their temperament, and advocated for a more humane approach to animal welfare.
What are the implications of the Supreme Court's decision?
The implications include the potential relocation of thousands of stray dogs to shelters, raising concerns about their welfare and the effectiveness of such measures in addressing public safety.
