Why Did the Arab Ministerial Committee Reject Israel's Measures to Isolate Jerusalem?

Click to start listening
Why Did the Arab Ministerial Committee Reject Israel's Measures to Isolate Jerusalem?

Synopsis

In a significant move, an Arab ministerial committee has denounced Israel's actions aimed at isolating Jerusalem. This rejection underscores the ongoing tensions surrounding the city's sovereignty and the rights of its inhabitants. The committee's condemnation of Israel's settlement plans highlights the urgency of addressing these complex issues in the pursuit of peace.

Key Takeaways

  • The Arab ministerial committee strongly opposes Israel's actions in Jerusalem.
  • Israel is criticized for its settlement expansion and its impact on Palestinian rights.
  • The committee emphasizes the need for adherence to international law.
  • The situation in Jerusalem remains a focal point of regional tensions.
  • Ongoing discussions are essential for achieving peace.

Cairo, Sep 5 (NationPress) An Arab ministerial committee has firmly rejected Israel's attempts to isolate Jerusalem, emphasizing that Israel lacks sovereignty over Jerusalem and its Islamic and Christian sacred sites.

The committee, tasked with coordinating international efforts against Israel's illegal policies in Jerusalem, released a statement following their 10th meeting during the 164th regular session of the Arab League (AL) Council, as reported by Xinhua news agency.

Established by the AL in 2021 and led by Jordan, the committee comprises representatives from Iraq, Palestine, Algeria, Somalia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, and the AL Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit.

In their statement, the committee condemned Israel's recent approval of the E1 settlement plan, viewing it as a precursor to isolating the Old City from its Palestinian context.

This approval represents an attempt to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state and constitutes a direct violation of the rights of the Palestinian people.

The committee denounced all actions aimed at altering the demographic and historical fabric of Jerusalem, asserting that such measures contravene international law and legitimate resolutions.

It also criticized Israel's efforts to impose restrictions on the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, thereby limiting Muslim worshippers' access.

Israel's occupation of East Jerusalem and the West Bank dates back to the Six-Day War of 1967, followed by the establishment of settlements that are widely regarded as illegal under international law, with a noticeable increase in such activities in recent years.

In late August, Israel approved plans for the construction of 3,401 housing units in E1, which connects the large settlement of Maale Adumim with East Jerusalem.

This development is expected to effectively divide the West Bank into northern and southern regions, disrupting Palestinian territorial continuity between East Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and Ramallah, while creating a continuous Jewish corridor between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim.

The Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in East Jerusalem is currently managed by the Jordanian Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs, through its Jerusalem Awqaf and Al-Aqsa Mosque Affairs Department, while security is maintained by Israeli police.

According to long-standing agreements, Jews may visit the site but are prohibited from praying there; however, some far-right Israelis have increasingly violated this restriction in recent years.

Point of View

I believe that the Arab ministerial committee's rejection of Israel's measures is a vital reflection of the collective sentiment among Arab states regarding Jerusalem. This stance not only reinforces the significance of international law but also highlights the need for a constructive dialogue that respects the rights of all parties involved.
NationPress
05/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the Arab ministerial committee's rejection?
The rejection signifies a unified Arab stance against Israeli actions perceived as undermining Palestinian rights and sovereignty over Jerusalem.
What are the implications of the E1 settlement plan?
The E1 settlement plan is seen as a threat to the continuity of Palestinian territories and a barrier to the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.
How does international law view Israeli settlements?
International law generally considers Israeli settlements in the occupied territories as illegal, emphasizing the need for adherence to established resolutions.