Is US Commerce Secretary Lutnick Intensifying Criticism on India?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's comments on India's trade policies have sparked controversy, as he suggests that the nation should sever ties with BRICS and reconsider its relationship with Russia. How will this affect US-India relations moving forward?
Key Takeaways
- US Commerce Secretary intensifies rhetoric on trade with India.
- India's reliance on Russian oil sparks controversy.
- Calls for India to reconsider its ties with BRICS.
- The ongoing trade tensions highlight the complex nature of global economics.
- India emphasizes mutual respect in bilateral relations.
Washington, Sep 5 (NationPress) US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has ramped up his criticism regarding the ongoing trade issues with India, asserting that New Delhi "still has no intention to open its market" and suggesting it should "disassociate itself from BRICS."
In a recent interview with Bloomberg on Friday, Lutnick mentioned that the US is "always open to discussions." However, he seemed to establish conditions prior to engaging with India.
"India doesn’t seem ready to open their market yet. They should cease purchasing Russian oil, right? And stop being part of BRICS, right? They are the link between Russia and China. If that’s the path they choose, so be it. But they need to either support the dollar, back the United States, and support their largest client, the American consumer, or they might face a 50 percent tariff. Let’s see how long that lasts," he added.
India has consistently denied claims suggesting that BRICS aims for de-dollarisation.
Earlier on Friday, US President Donald Trump also commented, suggesting that India and Russia seem to have been "lost" to China.
"It appears we’ve lost India and Russia to the depths of China. May they enjoy a long and successful future together!" he posted on Truth Social.
In the meantime, Lutnick reiterated the US stance against India's increasing share of Russian crude in its oil imports, labeling it as "plain wrong."
"Before the conflict with Russia, India imported less than 2 percent of their oil from there. Now they’re purchasing 40 percent. The Indians decided to buy at a lower price to profit. But that’s just plain wrong. They need to choose a side," he remarked.
Lutnick contended that the allure of the US economy would ultimately bring India back to negotiations.
"The Chinese sell to us. The Indians sell to us. They can’t rely on each other for sales. We are the global consumer. Remember, our $30 trillion economy is the consumer of the world. Eventually, they all have to return to their primary customer," he asserted.
Meanwhile, in New Delhi, the spokesperson for India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Randhir Jaiswal, also dismissed the "inaccurate and misleading" claims made by White House advisor Peter Navarro.
Regarding India-US relations, the MEA spokesperson emphasized that the bilateral "partnership has successfully navigated numerous transitions and challenges" and expressed hope that the "relationship will continue to progress based on mutual respect and shared interests."
Point of View
I believe that the rhetoric from US officials underscores the delicate balance of international relations. While trade tensions are escalating, it's essential to recognize the historical context of India-US ties and the need for constructive dialogue rather than threats.
NationPress
05/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the implications of Lutnick's statements?
Lutnick's remarks suggest a potential shift in US-India relations, emphasizing the need for India to reconsider its trade practices and alliances.
How has India responded to these criticisms?
India has rejected the allegations regarding BRICS and continues to maintain its focus on its bilateral relations with the US.
What role does BRICS play in India's foreign policy?
BRICS serves as a platform for India to engage with emerging economies, balancing its relationships with both Western and Eastern powers.
