Is the US Human Rights Report Misleading About India?

Click to start listening
Is the US Human Rights Report Misleading About India?

Synopsis

The MEA has strongly criticized the latest US human rights report, claiming it misrepresents India's democratic values. This article explores the ongoing tensions between India and the USCIRF, highlighting India’s commitment to human rights amidst international scrutiny.

Key Takeaways

  • MEA rejects US human rights report as biased.
  • Claims of minimal government action against human rights abuses refuted.
  • India emphasizes its pluralistic society and democratic values.
  • Ongoing criticism of USCIRF as politically motivated.
  • India remains focused on inclusive governance for human rights advancement.

New Delhi, Aug 14 (NationPress) The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) firmly dismissed the latest US human rights report, labeling it as “a blend of misrepresentations and biased projections” that reflect a limited comprehension of India’s democratic framework, pluralistic society, and strong institutional mechanisms dedicated to safeguarding human rights.

“As we have consistently stated, these reports are a combination of imputations, misrepresentations, and one-sided projections that indicate a poor understanding of India's democratic framework, pluralistic society, and robust institutional mechanisms for protecting human rights. We do not consider such biased assessments credible. Our focus remains on promoting the human rights of our citizens through inclusive governance and development,” stated MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal during a weekly media briefing.

Earlier this week, the US State Department, in its ‘2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’, asserted that the Indian government took “minimal steps” to identify and penalize officials responsible for human rights violations.

In March, India rejected a report from the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), arguing that it continues to produce biased and politically charged assessments.

“We have observed the recently released 2025 Annual Report of the USCIRF, which again follows its pattern of issuing biased and politically motivated evaluations. The USCIRF's ongoing attempts to distort isolated incidents and cast doubt on India's vibrant multicultural society reflect a deliberate agenda rather than genuine concern for religious freedom,” the MEA spokesperson remarked in response to media questions.

“India is home to 1.4 billion individuals who practice all known religions. However, we do not anticipate that the USCIRF will engage with the reality of India’s pluralistic framework or recognize the harmonious coexistence of its diverse communities. Such efforts to undermine India's reputation as a symbol of democracy and tolerance will not prevail. In fact, it is the USCIRF that should be designated as an entity of concern,” Jaiswal added in March.

This is not the first instance where India has criticized the USCIRF, the US federal agency that monitors universal rights to Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) abroad and provides policy recommendations to the President, Secretary of State, and US Congress. Last October, while responding to inquiries regarding the ‘Country Update’ on India in the USCIRF report, the MEA clarified that New Delhi's views on the agency are well established.

Point of View

It is essential to recognize that the MEA's defense reflects India's commitment to its democratic values and human rights. While criticisms may arise, acknowledging the complexity and diversity of India’s society is crucial in any assessment.
NationPress
19/08/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did India reject the US human rights report?
India rejected the US human rights report because it considers it a mix of misrepresentations and biased projections that do not accurately reflect India's democratic framework and human rights practices.
What are the main concerns raised by the MEA?
The MEA raised concerns about the report's lack of understanding of India's pluralistic society and robust institutional mechanisms for human rights protection.
How has India responded to the USCIRF reports?
India has consistently dismissed USCIRF reports as politically motivated and biased, asserting that they misrepresent the reality of religious freedom in the country.
What is the USCIRF?
The USCIRF is a US federal government agency that monitors the status of religious freedom abroad and makes policy recommendations regarding these issues.
What is India's stance on human rights?
India asserts its commitment to advancing human rights through inclusive governance and development, aiming to protect the rights of its diverse population.