Are Indian-Origin Businesses at Odds as the US Considers Lawsuits Over Stone Slabs?

Click to start listening
Are Indian-Origin Businesses at Odds as the US Considers Lawsuits Over Stone Slabs?

Synopsis

The clash between Indian-origin businesses in the US centers on proposed legislation that could impact workplace safety and corporate liability. As lawmakers deliberate, the implications for workers suffering from silicosis and the future of the stone slab industry hang in the balance.

Key Takeaways

  • Silicosis is a preventable disease affecting many workers in the stone slab industry.
  • Proposed legislation could limit accountability for manufacturers.
  • Indian-origin businesses are concerned about increased legal liabilities.
  • Australia has successfully implemented bans to protect workers.
  • Safe substitutes for stone slabs exist without sacrificing quality.

Washington, Jan 20 (NationPress) A heated discussion regarding worker safety, corporate liability, and the future of the US stone slab sector took place in Congress last week, involving entrepreneurs of Indian descent and highlighting issues pertinent to Indian businesses and laborers engaged in global supply chains.

During a session of a House Judiciary subcommittee, former US occupational safety chief David Michaels cautioned lawmakers that the introduction of new legislation to protect artificial stone manufacturers and suppliers from legal action could exacerbate what he termed a burgeoning silicosis crisis among countertop fabrication workers.

“Silicosis is a catastrophic, fatal, and entirely preventable condition,” Michaels remarked, noting that artificial stone fabrication is “one of the most perilous industries where workers encounter silica dust.”

Michaels informed the committee that hundreds of American workers had already suffered health complications, with numerous fatalities, due to silica exposure while cutting and polishing artificial stone utilized in kitchen countertops.

Referring to California health statistics, he stated that nearly 500 cases had been reported in that state alone, resulting in 27 deaths and multiple lung transplants. “If no action is taken to mitigate exposure, the number of cases and fatalities will keep rising,” he asserted.

He firmly opposed H.R. 5437, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act, arguing that legal actions are essential in compelling industries to adopt safer materials.

Michaels highlighted Australia’s approach, which banned high-silica engineered stone instead of limiting litigation, leading manufacturers to transition to safer alternatives without job losses. “There are safe substitutes that can create equally stylish countertops,” he said, adding that switching to alternatives would mean “no loss of American jobs.”

In contrast, Gary Talwar, vice president of Natural Stone Resources, a family-run business of Indian origin located in California, appealed to Congress to support the bill. Talwar shared that his parents immigrated legally from India in 1980 and built their business from scratch, framing it as a narrative deeply embedded in the American Dream.

“Silicosis is a serious and completely preventable condition,” Talwar acknowledged, but contended that the accountability rests with unsafe fabrication shops rather than distributors like his company, which does not cut, grind, or polish stone. “We do not dictate whether a shop employs wet cutting, ventilation, or personal protective equipment,” he noted, emphasizing that distributors are increasingly being implicated in numerous lawsuits for practices they do not manage.

Talwar expressed that escalating legal expenses are exerting immense pressure on small, frequently family-owned businesses nationwide. He informed lawmakers that some companies have already incurred hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal defense costs and are facing the dilemma of choosing between litigation and maintaining their operations. “Some are seriously contemplating closing their doors,” he said.

Jim Hieb, CEO of the Natural Stone Institute, echoed these sentiments, stating that while his trade group supports worker safety, it opposes what he described as misdirected litigation against stone slab suppliers. “Selling stone slabs does not cause silicosis,” Hieb noted. “It is the negligence regarding safety protocols during stone cutting and fabrication that poses the risk.”

Rebecca Shult, chief legal officer of Cambria, a quartz manufacturer based in Minnesota, indicated that her company endorses the legislation to safeguard American manufacturing jobs and domestic producers.

Silicosis results from inhaling fine silica particles and has long been a concern in mining, stone cutting, and construction, where officials have struggled to limit occupational exposure. In the US, the current debate revolves around whether Congress should step in to restrict civil liability or depend on workplace regulations and market transitions toward safer materials to avert additional disease and fatalities.

Point of View

It is essential to balance the interests of worker safety with the viability of businesses. The ongoing debate highlights the need for policies that protect both employees and entrepreneurs, ensuring a safe working environment while fostering economic growth.
NationPress
20/01/2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is silicosis?
Silicosis is a lung disease caused by inhaling fine silica dust, leading to severe health complications and even death.
How does the proposed legislation affect worker safety?
The proposed legislation aims to shield manufacturers from lawsuits, which could hinder accountability for unsafe practices in the stone slab industry.
What are the concerns of Indian-origin businesses regarding this legislation?
Many Indian-origin businesses fear that the proposed bill will increase their legal liabilities and financial burdens while undermining safety standards.
What steps have been taken in other countries regarding silicosis?
Countries like Australia have banned high-silica engineered stone to protect workers, prompting manufacturers to adopt safer alternatives.
Why is this debate significant?
This debate is crucial as it not only affects worker health but also the future of the US stone slab industry and the livelihood of many businesses.
Nation Press