Is the US Nuclear Deal Proposal Insincere Without Sanctions Removal?

Click to start listening
Is the US Nuclear Deal Proposal Insincere Without Sanctions Removal?

Synopsis

Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, has sharply criticized a recent US nuclear deal proposal, labeling it as insincere due to its failure to address sanctions lifting. With ongoing indirect talks, the Iranian government remains firm on its position regarding uranium enrichment and economic guarantees.

Key Takeaways

  • Iran's Position: The Iranian government insists on sanctions removal for any nuclear agreement.
  • Criticism of the US: The proposal from the US is seen as lacking sincerity by Iranian officials.
  • Ongoing Negotiations: Indirect talks mediated by Oman continue, but key issues remain unresolved.
  • Uranium Enrichment: Iran maintains its right to enrich uranium, a point of contention in negotiations.
  • Call for Change: Qalibaf urged US leadership to reconsider its approach for a genuine deal.

Tehran, June 9 (NationPress) Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stated that a recent proposal from the US regarding a nuclear agreement was contradictory and insincere as it failed to address the lifting of sanctions.

During an open session in Tehran, Qalibaf criticized the proposal, which was communicated through Oman in late May amidst ongoing indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington, as reported by Xinhua news agency.

He emphasized that Iran is prepared to take measures to affirm the peaceful nature of its nuclear program, as mandated by a law enacted in 2020 to counter US sanctions. In exchange, Iran anticipates the removal of sanctions, assurances of economic benefits, and the continued right to enrich uranium within its borders.

Qalibaf remarked, “The absence of sanctions removal in the US proposal illustrates that Washington’s approach to the nuclear discussions is both contradictory and insincere.”

He urged US President Donald Trump to reconsider his position if he genuinely desires a resolution, advising him to abandon what he termed the “failed ideas” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Iran and the United States have engaged in five rounds of indirect discussions mediated by Oman since April, aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief. Recently, Washington has insisted on a complete cessation of uranium enrichment, a demand that Iran has consistently refused.

Point of View

It's crucial to recognize that Iran's stance is unwavering in the face of US proposals lacking essential elements like sanctions removal. This reflects not just a diplomatic impasse but a broader geopolitical struggle. The nation stands firm in its approach, advocating for a resolution that respects its rights and economic interests.
NationPress
11/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf say about the US proposal?
Qalibaf described the US proposal as 'contradictory and insincere' due to its failure to mention the lifting of sanctions.
What does Iran want in return for demonstrating its nuclear program's peacefulness?
Iran expects the removal of sanctions, guarantees for economic benefits, and the right to enrich uranium domestically.
How has the US responded to Iran's nuclear activities?
The US has demanded a complete halt to uranium enrichment, a condition that Iran has rejected.