Did Russia Deny ICAO’s Ruling on the 2014 Malaysia Airlines Crash?

Click to start listening
Did Russia Deny ICAO’s Ruling on the 2014 Malaysia Airlines Crash?

Synopsis

The Kremlin has firmly rejected the ICAO's ruling blaming Russia for the 2014 Malaysia Airlines crash, asserting its commitment to an unbiased investigation. This ongoing controversy raises questions about accountability and international governance in aviation safety.

Key Takeaways

  • Moscow rejects ICAO's ruling on the MH17 crash.
  • Accusations against Russia are deemed biased.
  • Russia claims to have evidence supporting its non-involvement.
  • The crash resulted in the loss of 298 lives.
  • Call for an independent investigation continues.

Moscow, May 14 (NationPress) The Kremlin has dismissed the verdict of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) Council, which attributed blame for the 2014 Malaysia Airlines disaster to Russia.

The UN organization, ICAO, recently accused Russia of being responsible for the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 on July 17, 2014, over eastern Ukraine, resulting in the tragic loss of all 298 lives aboard.

"Russia will not acknowledge the Council's decision. It is illegitimate and contravenes the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation and its own procedural rules. Unlike the biased majority on the Council, Russia is committed to UN Security Council resolution 2166 (2014) and the pursuit of uncovering the true causes of the air crash," stated the foreign ministry of Russia.

The ministry firmly rejected any claims of Russia's involvement in the Malaysia Airlines incident.

"Last year, on June 17, 2024, Russia ceased its participation in this investigation as it was impossible to guarantee an unbiased inquiry due to numerous procedural violations by the ICAO Council and Secretariat. Nevertheless, Moscow's principled stance remains unchanged—Russia had no role in the MH17 crash, and allegations to the contrary by Australia and the Netherlands contradict the facts," it asserted.

"Previously, Russia provided the Council with compelling factual and legal evidence of its non-involvement in the crash and shared this information with all Council member countries. It was Kyiv that failed to close the airspace over the combat operations zone and used civilian passenger aircraft like MH17 as shields for its bombers," the ministry emphasized.

Earlier on Tuesday, during a press briefing, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov remarked that Russia considers the findings from the MH17 crash investigation as biased and does not accept them.

"I will not comment further. Our viewpoint is well-known. Russia was not among the parties involved in investigating the incident. Hence, we do not accept any of the prejudiced conclusions," noted the spokesperson for the Russian presidency.

Meanwhile, the Russian foreign ministry reiterated that Moscow had repeatedly proposed that the Council undertake a comprehensive and independent international investigation into the MH17 crash in accordance with UNSC resolution.

"However, driven by political motives and in breach of established procedures, the Council declined to carry out such an investigation and instead accepted Australia's and the Netherlands' claims and the findings of the joint investigative team, which includes Australia, the Netherlands, and Ukraine—nations directly interested in portraying Russia negatively," the ministry highlighted.

Point of View

It is crucial to approach the ongoing controversy surrounding the 2014 Malaysia Airlines crash with impartiality. Both sides present compelling narratives, but the pursuit of truth must remain the priority. The international community must ensure that investigations are fair and transparent to uphold trust among nations.
NationPress
08/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the ICAO ruling state?
The ICAO ruling attributed responsibility for the 2014 Malaysia Airlines crash to Russia.
What is Russia's stance on the ruling?
Russia rejects the ruling, calling it illegitimate and biased.
How many people were killed in the crash?
All 298 individuals on board the flight were killed.
What evidence has Russia presented?
Russia claims to have provided convincing evidence of its non-involvement in the crash.
What was Russia's participation in the investigation?
Russia halted its participation in the investigation due to perceived biases and procedural violations.