Human Rights Watch Decries Pakistani Airstrikes as 'Unlawful' and Highlights Potential for War Crimes

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Human Rights Watch Decries Pakistani Airstrikes as 'Unlawful' and Highlights Potential for War Crimes

Synopsis

Human Rights Watch has condemned Pakistan's airstrikes on a rehabilitation center in Kabul as unlawful, raising alarms over civilian safety and the potential for war crimes. The organization calls for an immediate investigation into the devastating attack that resulted in numerous civilian casualties.

Key Takeaways

Human Rights Watch condemns recent Pakistani airstrikes as unlawful.
The attacks have raised alarms about potential war crimes .
Hundreds of civilians were reportedly killed or injured.
Urgent calls for an impartial investigation have been made.
International law mandates accountability for such actions.

New York, March 27 (NationPress) The US-based advocacy organization, Human Rights Watch, criticized the recent Pakistani airstrikes on a rehabilitation center in Kabul, labeling it as “an unlawful assault.” The group expressed concerns that this incident could potentially be classified as a war crime, heightening fears regarding civilian safety and compliance with international law.

On March 16, Pakistan executed airstrikes on the 2,000-bed Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital in Kabul, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of civilians and injuring numerous others.

The rights organization urged Pakistani officials to undertake an immediate and fair investigation into the event to ensure accountability for those involved.

Patricia Gossman, senior associate Asia director at HRW, stated, “Evidence suggests that the Pakistani airstrike targeted a well-known medical facility in Kabul, resulting in the deaths of many patients, which is unlawful. It is essential for Pakistani authorities to conduct a thorough investigation to clarify why a drug treatment center filled with civilians was struck and to determine accountability.”

According to a staff member at the facility, over 1,000 patients were present at the Kabul rehabilitation center during the airstrike, although the exact number remains unclear. An official from an international agency noted that many patients were gathered in the dining area to break their Ramadan fast at the time.

The United Nations reported the “total destruction of one block that housed adolescents receiving drug treatment.”

On March 17, Attaullah Tarar, Pakistan’s federal minister of information and broadcasting, announced on X that Pakistan had conducted “precision airstrikes” targeting “technical support infrastructure and ammunition storage facilities,” without mentioning the Omid facility.

HRW asserted that there is no evidence to suggest that the Omid center was used for military purposes, thus classifying the attack as “unlawfully indiscriminate.”

“Regardless, this strike seemingly contravenes the prohibition against disproportionate attacks. Serious breaches of wartime law executed with criminal intent—be it deliberate or reckless—constitute war crimes,” the report emphasized.

According to HRW, Pakistan is obliged under international law to investigate alleged “war crimes by its forces and to hold accountable those responsible for significant abuses.”

With rising tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan, HRW referenced UN data revealing at least 76 civilian fatalities and 213 injuries resulting from Pakistani airstrikes throughout Afghanistan.

“Countries concerned should urge Pakistan to ensure genuine accountability while addressing shortcomings in intelligence, target verification, and decision-making processes to prevent such occurrences in the future,” Gossman added.

Point of View

It is imperative to approach this situation with a nation-first mindset while emphasizing the importance of human rights and accountability. The airstrikes undertaken by Pakistan represent a grave concern for civilian safety and highlight the necessity for compliance with international law.
NationPress
12 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Human Rights Watch say about the airstrikes?
Human Rights Watch labeled the airstrikes by Pakistan as 'unlawful' and warned that they could amount to a potential war crime, raising serious concerns about civilian safety.
How many casualties were reported from the airstrikes?
The airstrikes resulted in the deaths of hundreds of civilians and numerous injuries, with reports indicating at least 76 civilian fatalities and 213 injuries.
What is the Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital?
The Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital is a 2,000-bed rehabilitation center in Kabul that was targeted during the airstrikes, housing many patients at the time.
What action is being called for by Human Rights Watch?
Human Rights Watch is urging the Pakistani authorities to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the airstrikes and ensure accountability for those responsible.
What does international law say about such attacks?
International law prohibits indiscriminate attacks and those that result in disproportionate harm to civilians, which could classify the airstrikes as war crimes.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google