Pakistan's Diplomatic Struggles: A Report on US-Iran Talks
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Washington, April 16 (NationPress) Pakistan must prioritize its own stability before taking on the role of an international mediator, a recent report emphasized, referencing the unsuccessful talks held in Islamabad between Iran and the United States.
In an article for the US publication 'Inkstick Media', Marcus Andreopoulos pointed out that while Pakistan's attempts to broker a temporary ceasefire initially garnered attention globally, that optimism was short-lived after US Vice President J D Vance announced the absence of an agreement.
“Bringing both parties to discussions was merely the first step; the true challenge was Pakistan’s capability to foster a lasting peace agreement in the Middle East. This was an objective that the Islamabad discussions ultimately failed to fulfill,” Andreopoulos articulated.
The failure of this diplomatic effort, he noted, should not have come as a surprise.
“Pakistan lacked the necessary leverage or diplomatic skill to address the complex and contentious issues that dominated the Islamabad meeting, which included access to the Strait of Hormuz, the ongoing conflict in Lebanon, Iran's nuclear ambitions, sanctions relief, and compensation. Additionally, Islamabad had to weigh the ramifications of any concessions made to Iran against its relationship with Saudi Arabia. Riyadh has expressed significant concerns about Tehran's control over the Strait of Hormuz and the reported imposition of passage fees,” he elaborated.
He further explained how the ongoing conflict in West Asia and tensions arising from the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan have cast substantial doubt on the viability of the recent Saudi-Pakistan Mutual Defence Agreement, just six months after its signing, as neither nation seems prepared to assist the other.
“The conflict initiated by Trump's actions against Iran has revealed not only the military vulnerabilities of the Saudi-Pakistan agreement but has also highlighted the fundamental political differences between the two nations. Since the Hamas-led assault on October 7, 2023, and Israel's subsequent actions in Gaza, Islamabad has attempted to offer diplomatic support to Tehran while striving to avoid alienating Saudi Arabia or drawing condemnation from the US,” he stated.
“At the same time, Pakistan has engaged in a diplomatic outreach to the Trump administration, even nominating the President for the Nobel Peace Prize twice, and participating as a founding member of the so-called 'Board of Peace'. Until recently, Pakistan maintained this seemingly contradictory foreign policy without significant objection,” Andreopoulos asserted.
He referenced an incident where hundreds of Pakistanis displayed unrest outside the US Consulate in Karachi following the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, indicating that despite Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's intention to foster good relations with President Donald Trump, there are evident political limitations on Pakistan's ability to openly support US actions in the Middle East.
“The situation in the Middle East now holds an uncertain future. What is clear, however, is that the Saudi-Pakistan defence pact requires a significant reassessment if it is to restore its credibility as a viable deterrent. When it was established last September, the treaty was met with enthusiasm, but there is still no sign that either Islamabad or Riyadh will provide mutual support, rendering the agreement largely ineffective. The survival of this pact amid ongoing hostilities in the Middle East and South Asia is questionable. What value does a pact hold if it fails to prevent conflict and ensure military backing from its signatories?” he concluded.