Is South Korea's ex-President Yoon filing a constitutional petition over insurrection charges?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol has taken a bold step by filing a constitutional petition regarding a special probe bill linked to his insurrection charges. With significant implications for his trial, Yoon's absence raises questions about the legal proceedings. Can the court proceed without him? Read on for more details on this unfolding situation.
Key Takeaways
- Yoon Suk Yeol has filed a constitutional petition regarding insurrection charges.
- The court is proceeding with the trial despite his absence.
- Yoon's case could result in severe penalties, including life imprisonment.
- There are plans to merge his trial with those of his associates.
- The speed of the trial has faced criticism due to witness selection.
Seoul, Sep 8 (NationPress) The former President of South Korea, Yoon Suk Yeol, has submitted a constitutional petition regarding a special probe bill linked to his insurrection charges. He argues that the bill is unconstitutional, as he has been absent from his insurrection trial for the eighth consecutive session, leading the court to move forward without his presence.
Additionally, Yoon's legal team has requested a court record for a constitutional review concerning the legality of the special probe bill, as reported by Yonhap news agency.
Since his second arrest on July 10, on charges tied to his unsuccessful attempt to enforce martial law, Yoon has refrained from attending the trial at the Seoul Central District Court, citing health concerns.
The court announced on Monday that it would continue with the proceedings in his absence, as the Seoul Detention Centre indicated it was not feasible to forcibly bring him to court.
Yoon faces allegations of leading an insurrection and misusing his power during his failed martial law initiative in December. The charges of insurrection could result in a maximum penalty of life imprisonment or even death.
In the meantime, the court plans to finalize the trial proceedings by December, indicating that it is likely to be integrated with the insurrection trials of former Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun and Police Chief Cho Ji-ho, both of whom were involved in Yoon's martial law attempt.
Judge Jee Kui-youn remarked that while the three cases are currently being handled separately, they share significant issues and evidence, suggesting that they will likely be consolidated into a single case.
This development comes amidst criticism regarding the speed of Yoon's trial, particularly concerning the number of witnesses selected.
During the hearing on Monday, the court was prepared to hear testimony from an official associated with the Defence Counterintelligence Command, which played a role in the martial law operations.
According to the Criminal Procedure Code, a trial may proceed without the defendant if he refuses to attend without valid reasons and it is considered impossible or exceedingly difficult for a prison officer to bring him by force.
Point of View
It's imperative to remain impartial while reporting on the ongoing legal battles surrounding former President Yoon Suk Yeol. His case highlights the complexities of legal proceedings in high-profile political matters. We must continue to provide accurate information while respecting the judicial process.
NationPress
09/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the charges against Yoon Suk Yeol?
Yoon Suk Yeol faces charges of leading an insurrection and abusing his power in connection with his unsuccessful attempt to impose martial law.
Why was Yoon absent from his trial?
Yoon has cited health issues as the reason for his absence from the trial at the Seoul Central District Court since his second arrest on July 10.
What is the maximum penalty for insurrection in South Korea?
In South Korea, the crime of insurrection carries a potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.
Will the trials of Yoon and his associates be merged?
Yes, the court plans to merge Yoon's trial with those of former Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun and Police Chief Cho Ji-ho, as they involve similar issues and evidence.
What does the Criminal Procedure Code state regarding absent defendants?
According to the Criminal Procedure Code, a trial can proceed without the defendant if they refuse to attend without legitimate grounds and it is deemed difficult for a prison officer to bring them in by force.
