Could South Korea's Constitution Change to Allow Two Four-Year Presidential Terms?

Click to start listening
Could South Korea's Constitution Change to Allow Two Four-Year Presidential Terms?

Synopsis

Lee Jae-myung, the Democratic Party's presidential candidate in South Korea, has proposed a significant constitutional amendment allowing a president to serve two four-year terms. This could reshape the political landscape by increasing accountability and reducing presidential powers. The proposal aims for a referendum during the next local elections, encouraging discussions on governance reforms.

Key Takeaways

  • Proposal for two four-year presidential terms
  • Enhancement of presidential accountability
  • Call for a referendum in 2028
  • Introduction of a runoff election system
  • Limitation of presidential powers

Seoul, May 18 (NationPress) The South Korean Democratic Party (DP) presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung has put forward a proposal to amend the nation's Constitution, aiming to permit a president to serve two four-year terms. This initiative is anticipated to diminish presidential powers, as voters would have the opportunity to assess a president's performance after the first term, Lee indicated in a Facebook update.

By implementing a double-term presidency, Lee believes that a president's accountability will be enhanced, especially with mid-term elections introduced. He urged the National Assembly to establish a special committee to engage in discussions regarding the proposed amendment, as reported by Yonhap news agency.

Since the amendment to the Constitution in 1987, South Korea has operated under a single five-year presidential term. Lee suggested holding a referendum on the amendment during the upcoming local elections next year or the general elections in 2028.

Additionally, he proposed the implementation of a runoff system for presidential elections to reduce social conflict, along with requiring parliamentary recommendations for prime minister appointments and approval for heads of government agencies.

Lee also advocated for constraining presidential veto powers and insisted that the president should seek parliamentary consent when declaring martial law. In emergencies, if parliamentary approval is not obtained within 24 hours, the declaration should automatically lose its effect, he asserted.

After commemorating the 1980 Gwangju pro-democracy uprising, Lee informed reporters that the proposed constitutional amendment for the two-term presidency would not be applicable to the current president. He stated, “Our Constitution stipulates that amendments do not affect the sitting president.” He expressed that if the amendment is enacted shortly after the local elections, it would be timely.

Lee emphasized the need for thoughtful consideration regarding the terms for the nation’s leader. He noted, “Stabilizing the country and enhancing citizens’ livelihoods are more crucial than the constitutional amendment itself.” He believes it would be logical to pursue the amendment alongside the forthcoming local elections.

Highlighting the collaborative nature of constitutional amendments, Lee called for a focus on compromise rather than a complete overhaul.

Point of View

It's essential to recognize Lee Jae-myung's proposal as a pivotal moment for South Korea's political evolution. This amendment could significantly alter the balance of power and promote greater accountability. However, it is crucial to navigate constitutional changes thoughtfully, ensuring the stability and welfare of the nation remain paramount.
NationPress
08/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the proposed constitutional amendment?
Lee Jae-myung proposed an amendment to allow presidents to serve two four-year terms, enhancing accountability and reducing powers.
When will the referendum on the amendment take place?
Lee suggested the referendum could occur during local elections next year or the general elections in 2028.
What other changes did Lee propose?
He proposed a runoff system for elections, limiting presidential veto powers, and requiring parliamentary consent for martial law declarations.
Will the amendment affect the current president?
No, Lee stated that the amendment would not apply to the sitting president as per the Constitution.
Why is this amendment important?
The amendment aims to enhance presidential accountability and stability, aligning with the needs of the citizens.