Did Allahabad HC Deny Abbas Ansari's Plea in Hate Speech Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal setback, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed Abbas Ansari's plea challenging key evidence in a hate speech case linked to his political campaign. This ruling underscores the court's firm stance on the matter as Ansari navigates the complexities of the legal system.
Key Takeaways
- Abbas Ansari's petition rejected.
- Key evidence CD upheld.
- Two-year prison sentence confirmed.
- Legal remedies advised in Sessions Court.
- Political implications for Uttar Pradesh.
Prayagraj, June 25 (NationPress) Former MLA Abbas Ansari, the son of late mafia don Mukhtar Ansari, faced a blow on Wednesday when the Allahabad High Court rejected his petition that questioned the legitimacy of a CD that served as crucial evidence in a hate speech case.
The CD was instrumental in his conviction, resulting in a two-year prison sentence from a lower court.
A single-judge Bench led by Justice Samit Gopal chose not to intervene, advising Ansari to present his concerns regarding the CD and the related forensic report in the Sessions Court, where his appeal is still pending.
In his petition, Ansari argued that his speech was misrepresented and that the video evidence had been altered. However, the High Court refused to provide him with any relief.
This hate speech case traces back to March 3, 2022, amidst the Uttar Pradesh Assembly election campaign, during which Abbas Ansari, then running for Mau Sadar, allegedly made provocative remarks aimed at government officials.
A video of his speech gained widespread attention, leading to a complaint filed by Inspector Gangaram Bind and the subsequent lodging of an FIR at the Mau Kotwali police station.
In his address, Ansari allegedly stated that should Akhilesh Yadav's government take power in Uttar Pradesh, officials would be accountable before being reassigned.
The Election Commission took notice of his comments and initiated necessary actions.
On May 31, the MP-MLA court in Mau sentenced him to two years in prison, which consequently ended his Assembly membership.
According to the Representation of People Act, any lawmaker sentenced to two years or more faces automatic termination of their membership.
Since then, Ansari has been seeking legal avenues, but the High Court has instructed him to pursue the matter through the appeals process.
Ansari was first elected as MLA in the 2022 Assembly elections from the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party (SBSP), previously an ally of the Samajwadi Party, which is now part of the BJP-led coalition government in Uttar Pradesh.
Point of View
The dismissal of Abbas Ansari's plea by the Allahabad High Court raises important questions about accountability and the rule of law in political discourse. As the nation watches closely, this case serves as a reminder of the responsibilities held by public figures and the consequences of their words.
NationPress
25/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the basis for Abbas Ansari's conviction?
Abbas Ansari was convicted based on a CD that served as key evidence in a hate speech case, leading to a two-year prison sentence.
What did Abbas Ansari claim in his petition?
He claimed that his speech was misrepresented and that the video evidence had been distorted.
What are the implications of the court's ruling?
The ruling reinforces the accountability of public figures and highlights the legal consequences of inflammatory remarks during an election campaign.
What is the next step for Abbas Ansari?
The High Court has directed him to address his concerns in the Sessions Court, where his appeal is pending.
How does this case affect Abbas Ansari's political career?
The conviction and subsequent dismissal of his plea could significantly impact his political future and membership in the Assembly.
