Amit Shah Critiques Rahul Gandhi's Absence in Key Debates and House Attendance
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, March 11 (NationPress) Union Home Minister Amit Shah delivered a pointed critique of Congress and Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday, challenging his ‘seriousness’ and the validity of his claims about being silenced in the House.
Shah highlighted several past instances where the prominent Congress figure seemed absent due to his regular foreign trips and reluctance to engage in significant debates, including topics like Vande Mataram and the land acquisition bill.
“The LoP asserts he is prevented from speaking in the House; however, I contend he simply does not wish to speak,” Shah countered strongly against Congress's allegations.
In reaction to KC Venugopal's assertion that the Speaker interrupted the LoP multiple times, Shah questioned, “What should the Speaker do when the wayward leader does not heed?”
Shah pointed out that Rahul Gandhi's attendance in the 17th Lok Sabha stood at only 51% compared to the national average of 67%. His attendance in the 16th Lok Sabha was 52% against a national average of 80%, and in the 15th Lok Sabha, it was just 43% while the national average was 76%.
Shah remarked that the Congress MP failed to participate in various discussions, including the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address, budget discussions, and critical bills.
He also criticized Rahul for his frequent foreign travels, asserting that the Congress MP opts to travel abroad while Parliament is in session.
“How can he engage from abroad when Parliament is in session? There’s no option for video conferencing,” Shah pointed out.
Amit Shah also referenced Rahul’s ‘hug and wink’ antics within Parliament, questioning how any member could engage in such behavior and still maintain a claim to moral superiority.
The Congress-led Opposition, outraged by Shah’s repeated references to Rahul’s absence from the House, insisted that the discussion should focus on the Speaker’s ‘biased and partisan’ actions rather than the conduct of the former. They demanded an intervention from the Chair.
As the Home Minister intensified his remarks, the House erupted into chaos, with Opposition members engaging in loud sloganeering.