Is the Anandpal Singh Encounter Fake? Wife Seeks Justice in Court
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Raj Kanwar claims the police encounter of her husband, Anandpal Singh, was staged. Her petition challenges the legitimacy of police actions and calls for accountability, reigniting debates on judicial compliance in encounter cases.
Key Takeaways
- Raj Kanwar challenges the legitimacy of the police encounter.
- The petition seeks compliance with Supreme Court directives.
- Public trust in the justice system is at stake.
- Legal proceedings can impact police accountability.
- The case highlights ongoing issues with encounter practices in India.
Jaipur, Aug 14 (NationPress) The 2017 encounter case of Anandpal Singh from Malasar village in Churu district has taken a dramatic turn as his wife, Raj Kanwar, has submitted a petition in the District and Sessions Court of Churu, claiming that the encounter was fabricated and requesting adherence to the directives issued by the Supreme Court.
Filed on August 13 through attorney Narendra Singh Rathore, the petition asserts that the CBI court has already deemed the encounter as fraudulent.
Despite this, Raj Kanwar alleges that several police officers involved received out-of-turn promotions and gallantry awards, which is against the Supreme Court’s ruling from September 23, 2014 that mandates such honors can only be given after confirming acts of bravery beyond reasonable doubt.
The petition urges the court to revoke all benefits awarded to these officers and to launch legal actions against them.
Furthermore, it calls for strict compliance with the apex court’s guidelines in similar cases, asserting that such adherence is critical for upholding the rule of law and preserving public trust in the judicial system.
Anandpal Singh, a notorious criminal with 24 cases against him—including murder, robbery, and kidnapping—was killed during an encounter on June 24, 2017, in Malasar village by the Rajasthan Police’s Special Operations Group (SOG) and other units.
His family and supporters have long claimed that the encounter was staged, leading to widespread protests throughout Rajasthan at the time.
The case has remained controversial for years, with ongoing calls for an independent investigation.
Raj Kanwar’s recent legal action not only aims to question the legitimacy of the police's actions but also to bring attention to what she perceives as a blatant violation of judicial orders.
With the petition now in the hands of the Churu court, discussions surrounding alleged fake encounters, police accountability, and the enforcement of Supreme Court guidelines in such matters are likely to resurface.
The court's ruling could have significant consequences for the officers involved and the management of encounter cases across India, officials noted.
Point of View
It is crucial to uphold the integrity of our justice system. The allegations presented by Raj Kanwar serve as a reminder of the importance of police accountability and adherence to judicial orders. We must ensure that all encounters are scrutinized to maintain public trust.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main allegations in Raj Kanwar's petition?
Raj Kanwar alleges that the police encounter of her husband, Anandpal Singh, was fake and seeks to revoke promotions and awards given to the involved officers.
What was the Supreme Court's stance on police encounters?
The Supreme Court has stated that awards can only be given after confirming acts of bravery beyond reasonable doubt, particularly following an encounter.
What do the protests in Rajasthan signify?
The protests highlight public concern over alleged fake encounters and the need for accountability within the police force.
What could be the outcome of the court's decision?
The court's decision could have significant ramifications for the police officers involved and for the handling of future encounter cases.
Why is this case still relevant today?
The Anandpal Singh case continues to spark debates on justice, police accountability, and the enforcement of Supreme Court guidelines.
