Is the Assam government implementing a ‘dangerous political strategy’ to incite communal unrest? - Akhil Gogoi

Click to start listening
Is the Assam government implementing a ‘dangerous political strategy’ to incite communal unrest? - Akhil Gogoi

Synopsis

Akhil Gogoi, Raijor Dal Chief, has accused the Assam government of orchestrating a perilous political strategy aimed at inciting communal unrest in the run-up to the 2026 Assembly elections. His claims raise serious questions about the government's motives and its impact on Assam's social fabric.

Key Takeaways

  • Akhil Gogoi criticizes the Assam government for its alleged strategy to incite communal unrest.
  • The issuance of arms licenses to local residents is seen as a tactic to provoke tensions.
  • Gogoi demands the resignation of Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.
  • There are concerns regarding the targeting of professionals amid identity checks.
  • Calls for alternative solutions emphasize law enforcement and community safety.

Guwahati, May 30 (NationPress) Raijor Dal Chief and Sivasagar MLA Akhil Gogoi delivered a fierce critique of the Assam government on Friday, alleging it is executing a “dangerous political strategy” designed to incite communal discord in the lead-up to the 2026 Assembly elections.

Gogoi asserted that the recent decision to issue arms licenses to local populations in select districts is a calculated maneuver to ignite Hindu-Muslim tensions under the guise of protecting local communities.

“If the government claims it cannot safeguard indigenous people, it signifies a failure of the Home Department. It is truly shameful,” he stated, demanding the resignation of Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.

He argued that this initiative is not about security but rather a strategy for electoral gain, accusing Sarma of allowing the proliferation of arms among Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) members, thus fostering fear within minority communities.

“This is not just a routine policy move; it risks fracturing Assam and disrupting communal harmony before the elections,” he cautioned.

Gogoi drew comparisons to previous tactics employed during the Congress administration, when Sarma was part of that party, stating, “Now, with dwindling support for the BJP, Sarma is repeating these divisive methods.”

The legislator expressed concern over the targeting of professionals, including teachers, amid ongoing identification of suspected illegal immigrants, claiming such actions are intimidation tactics aimed at specific communities.

“This is not governance; it is fear-mongering,” he remarked.

Gogoi elaborated on what he views as a broader strategy: “First, the government distributes arms licenses. Next, individuals are arbitrarily designated as foreigners. Now, local organizations are being used to incite hate. This sequence is not coincidental; it is part of a deliberate plan to divide the state.”

Rejecting the government’s justification for the arms policy as a means of protecting indigenous groups, Gogoi called for alternative approaches.

“If the government genuinely cares for indigenous people, it should fortify law enforcement, deploy more CRPF personnel, enhance police infrastructure, and ensure justice. Distributing weapons to civilians and RSS members is not the solution,” he asserted.

He demanded an immediate retraction of the arms license policy and urged the state cabinet to make all related documents public.

Warning of widespread mobilization if the policy remains in place, Gogoi stated, “This will only breed chaos and ignite communal strife. We will initiate vigorous protests if the government does not change its course.”

In a move intended to enhance self-defense capabilities in Assam’s remote and sensitive regions, the state cabinet has sanctioned the issuance of arms licenses to “eligible residents” in vulnerable and border areas.

Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma announced this decision on Wednesday, referencing Assam’s distinct security challenges and geographic vulnerabilities.

“Assam is a complex and sensitive state,” CM Sarma noted. “We have opted to issue arms licenses to eligible individuals residing in remote, vulnerable, and border regions. We will encourage original inhabitants and indigenous Indian citizens to apply under the provisions of the Arms Act,” he added.

Point of View

Akhil Gogoi's assertions reflect growing concerns over political strategies that exploit communal tensions. While the government defends its actions as necessary for security, the implications of these policies warrant serious scrutiny. The discourse surrounding this issue should focus on promoting unity and safeguarding the rights of all communities in Assam.
NationPress
21/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Akhil Gogoi accuse the Assam government of?
Akhil Gogoi accused the Assam government of orchestrating a dangerous political strategy aimed at inciting communal unrest ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.
What concerns did Gogoi raise about the arms license policy?
Gogoi expressed concerns that issuing arms licenses to local residents could exacerbate Hindu-Muslim tensions and create an atmosphere of fear, particularly among minority communities.
How did the Assam government justify the arms license policy?
The Assam government justified the arms license policy by stating it aims to bolster self-defense capabilities in the state's remote and vulnerable areas.
What alternative solutions did Gogoi propose?
Gogoi suggested the government should focus on strengthening law enforcement, deploying more CRPF personnel, and ensuring justice rather than distributing arms to civilians.
What actions did Gogoi threaten if the arms policy is not revoked?
Gogoi warned of mass mobilization and strong protests if the Assam government does not withdraw the arms license policy.