Did Bengal Minister Compare Rohingyas to Netaji's Azad Hind Fauj?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Kolkata's political landscape is in turmoil as Education Minister Bratya Basu faces backlash for comparing Rohingya infiltrators to the Azad Hind Fauj. This controversial statement has sparked heated debates about history and patriotism, with strong reactions from the BJP demanding accountability.
Key Takeaways
- Bratya Basu compares Rohingyas to Azad Hind Fauj.
- His statement has generated strong reactions from the BJP.
- Calls for an apology and resignation from Basu are ongoing.
- The Azad Hind Fauj was crucial in promoting nationalism.
- Historical context matters in political discourse.
Kolkata, Nov 1 (NationPress) During the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of West Bengal's electoral rolls, state Education Minister Bratya Basu ignited controversy on Saturday by likening Rohingya infiltrators to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's Azad Hind Fauj.
The ruling Trinamool Congress has been critical of the Election Commission's initiative to conduct the SIR exercise within the state, with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee previously expressing strong disapproval of the endeavor.
The BJP, however, argues that the revision is essential to identify alleged Rohingya infiltrators within West Bengal.
In addressing the situation, Basu stated, "The BJP is a dangerous party. They fail to comprehend the geography. The route through which the Rohingyas enter the nation from Myanmar is identical to the path taken by the Azad Hind Fauj from former Burma to Kolkata. The BJP is disparaging that route."
His comments led to a fierce backlash from the BJP, who accused Basu of disrespecting the Azad Hind Fauj and misrepresenting historical facts.
Union Minister of State for Education and DoNER Sukanta Majumdar criticized Basu via social media, labeling his remark as "extremely regrettable and condemnable."
Majumdar remarked: "It is profoundly regrettable and condemnable to equate the Rohingyas with the courageous fighters of the Azad Hind Fauj. When the Azad Hind Fauj, under the revered Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, entered Indian territory through Burma in 1944, the Nehru-Congress was creating chaos by branding them as ‘infiltrators’. This modern application of the same terminology is a grave insult to India's freedom history and patriotism."
The BJP is demanding a prompt apology from Basu and has even called for his resignation over the contentious statement.
The Azad Hind Fauj was established during World War II under the leadership of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, with the objective of achieving India's independence from British rule through armed resistance.
Although it did not secure military success, the Azad Hind Fauj significantly contributed to stimulating nationalist emotions throughout India.
Point of View
The recent statements made by Minister Bratya Basu regarding the Rohingyas and the Azad Hind Fauj highlight the delicate balance between political discourse and historical accuracy. As the nation grapples with its identity and past, it's crucial to approach such statements with a lens of understanding and context.
NationPress
04/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the controversy surrounding Bratya Basu's statement?
Bratya Basu compared Rohingya infiltrators to the Azad Hind Fauj, which led to backlash from the BJP who accused him of disrespecting historical figures.
Why is the SIR exercise being conducted in West Bengal?
The Special Intensive Revision is aimed at updating electoral rolls, with the BJP arguing it is necessary to identify alleged Rohingya infiltrators.
Who was the Azad Hind Fauj?
The Azad Hind Fauj was an armed force led by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose during World War II, aimed at liberating India from British rule.
What reactions did Basu's comments evoke?
The BJP demanded an apology and even called for Basu's resignation, describing his comparison as offensive and historically inaccurate.
What was the role of the Azad Hind Fauj in India's independence?
Though not militarily victorious, the Azad Hind Fauj significantly boosted nationalist sentiments in India during the struggle for independence.
