BJP's Bansuri Swaraj slams Rahul Gandhi over NEET protest near PM's residence

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP's Bansuri Swaraj slams Rahul Gandhi over NEET protest near PM's residence

Synopsis

BJP's Bansuri Swaraj didn't just criticise Rahul Gandhi's protest near the PM's residence — she turned the NEET controversy into a question of parliamentary legitimacy. By pointing out that it was the treasury benches, not the Opposition, who filed the notice for a NEET debate, she flipped the narrative: who is really running away from accountability?

Key Takeaways

BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj on 22 July accused Rahul Gandhi of 'only creating a ruckus' instead of fulfilling Opposition duties.
Rahul Gandhi , Akhilesh Yadav , and senior Congress leaders staged a sit-in near PM Modi's residence on 21 July over the NEET paper leak; they were briefly detained.
Swaraj alleged protesters at Jantar Mantar sat for 21 days without police action, arguing the government had shown restraint.
BJP claimed no formal parliamentary notice on NEET was filed by the Opposition — the '193' notice was submitted by the treasury benches.
Swaraj alleged Rahul Gandhi retracted a statement that protesters would leave if Parliament agreed to discuss the issue, even after MoS Jitendra Singh reached out.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Bansuri Swaraj on Wednesday, 22 July launched a sharp attack on Congress MP and Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of abandoning his parliamentary duties and 'only attempting to create a ruckus' instead of engaging through constitutional channels. The remarks came a day after Gandhi, alongside senior Congress leaders and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, staged a sit-in near Prime Minister Narendra Modi's residence in New Delhi over the alleged lathi charge on anti-NEET leak protesters, before being briefly detained by police.

Key Developments

Addressing a press conference in New Delhi, Swaraj reiterated the Centre's position that the Modi government has consistently prioritised students' interests. 'We work to ensure protection of the students' future,' she said. She also claimed that the protest movement, linked to the NEET paper leak controversy and demands for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, had been 'politicised' by opposition parties for electoral gain.

What the BJP Said About the Protest

Swaraj cited the case of activist Abhijeet Dipke, who returned from the United States on 6 June, saying Delhi Police granted him protest permission at the airport itself on the same day. She noted that although that permission expired at 5 pm, protesters continued their sit-in at Jantar Mantar for 21 days without any police action to disperse them. 'The government allowed this protest as long as it was peaceful. It is your right to oppose in a democracy... even when the protest took place without permission, the government didn't create obstruction,' she said.

BJP's Charge on Parliament Notice

Swaraj further alleged that no formal notice for a parliamentary discussion on the NEET paper leak had been submitted by the Opposition. She said it was the treasury benches — not the Leader of Opposition — who filed a '193' notice seeking an open debate on the NEET examination. 'The House does not function on anybody's whims and fancies,' she remarked. She added that she herself had submitted a notice for discussion, stating the government 'has nothing to hide' and is 'committed to students' welfare.'

The Retraction Allegation

Swaraj accused Rahul Gandhi of going back on his own word. According to her, Gandhi had indicated that if the government was willing to discuss the issue in Parliament, protesters would vacate the site. She claimed that Union Minister of State Jitendra Singh then went to the protest location to open a dialogue — but that Gandhi subsequently retracted from his stated position. 'The Lok Sabha LoP retracted from his statement,' she alleged.

What Comes Next

With Parliament in session and the NEET controversy continuing to dominate political discourse, the standoff between the treasury benches and the Opposition over the preferred forum for debate — the street versus the House — is likely to intensify. Swaraj's remarks signal that the BJP intends to frame the Opposition's street protests as an evasion of legislative accountability, a line of attack it is expected to press in the coming days.

Point of View

It positions Rahul Gandhi as performative rather than parliamentary. But the charge cuts both ways — the NEET paper leak is a genuine governance failure, and framing street protest as 'ruckus' risks appearing dismissive of legitimate student grievance. The real test for both sides is whether Parliament actually holds a substantive, uninterrupted debate on the leak — or whether procedural point-scoring continues to substitute for accountability.
NationPress
22 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Rahul Gandhi protest near PM Modi's residence?
Rahul Gandhi, along with senior Congress leaders and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, staged a sit-in near Prime Minister Modi's residence on 21 July to protest the alleged lathi charge on anti-NEET leak demonstrators. The group was briefly detained by police. The protest is linked to broader demands for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the NEET paper leak.
What did BJP's Bansuri Swaraj say about Rahul Gandhi?
Swaraj alleged at a press conference on 22 July that Rahul Gandhi was 'running away from the duties of the Opposition' and 'only attempting to create a ruckus.' She also accused him of retracting a statement that protesters would vacate the site if Parliament agreed to discuss the NEET issue.
Did the Opposition file a notice for a NEET debate in Parliament?
According to BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj, no formal notice for a NEET discussion was filed by the Leader of Opposition. She claimed it was the treasury benches that submitted the '193' notice seeking an open debate, while Swaraj herself also filed a separate notice.
What is the NEET paper leak controversy?
The NEET paper leak refers to allegations that question papers for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) were leaked ahead of the examination, compromising its integrity. The controversy has triggered nationwide student protests and Opposition demands for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.
What was the government's response to the NEET protests at Jantar Mantar?
According to Bansuri Swaraj, Delhi Police granted protest permission to activist Abhijeet Dipke on the day of his return from the US on 6 June. She said protesters remained at Jantar Mantar for 21 days, including after the permission expired at 5 pm, without any police action to remove them — which she cited as evidence of the government's 'sensitive' attitude toward the movement.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 32 min ago
  2. 1 hour ago
  3. 1 hour ago
  4. 4 hours ago
  5. 17 hours ago
  6. 21 hours ago
  7. 23 hours ago
  8. Yesterday
Google Prefer NP
On Google