Did BJP and JD(U) Slam Telangana CM Reddy for His Remarks on Hindu Deities?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy's recent comments about Hindu deities have ignited a firestorm of political controversy, drawing sharp criticism from BJP and JD(U). As reactions flood in, the implications of his words raise questions about respect for religious sentiments in politics. What does this mean for the political landscape in Telangana?
Key Takeaways
- Revanth Reddy's comments have sparked significant political controversy.
- The BJP and JD(U) have strongly condemned his remarks.
- There are mixed reactions within Congress regarding the statement.
- This incident highlights the sensitivity of religious discourse in politics.
- The political fallout may influence future electoral dynamics in Telangana.
New Delhi, Dec 3 (NationPress) Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy has caused a political uproar with his humorous comment implying that Hindus have “a deity for every occasion.” This statement has evoked strong backlash, with both the BJP and JD(U) accusing him of disrespecting Hinduism. They further asserted that such remarks could only originate from someone linked to the lineage of Aurangzeb.
Union Minister Prahlad Joshi remarked, “Insulting Hinduism and showing disregard for Hindu beliefs has become a routine for Congress and its allied parties. Whether in Karnataka, Kerala, or now Telangana, the Chief Ministers seem to favor just one community. These leaders have become overly sensitive to others while mocking Hindus and their beliefs. This pattern is troubling.”
Union Minister Giriraj Singh also criticized Reddy's comment, stating, “Only someone connected to the lineage of Aurangzeb would use such language.”
JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar expressed, “As Chief Minister, Revanth Reddy's remark is regrettable. No one should make comments about the deities of any religion. It is essential for the constituent parties of the INDIA bloc to clarify their stance on this.”
BJP MP Sambit Patra condemned the statement, asserting, “Whether it is Maulana Madani or the Congress Party, both seem to share the same tone today. I strongly condemn the Congress for the objectionable language used by the Telangana Chief Minister regarding Hindu deities, which reflects deep-seated contempt for Hindus. Reddy’s comments about three crore Hindu deities—different gods for various lifestyles—are unacceptable.”
In contrast, reactions within Congress varied. Congress MP Imran Masood remarked, “I’m not clear on what he said, but the choice of words should not hurt anyone’s sentiments.”
Congress spokesperson Surendra Rajput stated, “Sanatan Dharma teaches that ‘Hari Anant, Hari Katha Ananta.’ With 33 crore deities, Sanatan Dharma is expansive and transcends a single scripture. Whether formally acknowledged or not, all are regarded as Sanatani. Reddy’s statement should be interpreted in a broader context.”
The controversy ignited after videos emerged online of Reddy’s address during a Congress executive meeting on December 2, leading the opposition to accuse him of hurting Hindu sentiments.
In the video, Reddy remarked, “How many deities are there in Hinduism? Three crores? Why? For unmarried individuals, there is Hanuman. For those who marry twice, there is another deity. For drinkers, another. Yellamma, Pochamma, Maisamma. For chicken eaters, a different god, and for those consuming dal-rice, another. There are deities for everything.”
Point of View
It is essential to approach this controversy with impartiality. The remarks by Telangana CM Revanth Reddy have triggered significant backlash from political opponents, revealing the sensitive nature of religious discourse in Indian politics. It is crucial to maintain a balanced perspective while acknowledging the diverse beliefs within the community, ensuring that freedom of speech and respect for all religions coexist.
NationPress
03/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Telangana CM Revanth Reddy say?
Revanth Reddy suggested that Hindus have a deity for every occasion, which has drawn criticism from various political factions.
Why did BJP and JD(U) criticize Reddy's remarks?
They accused him of insulting Hinduism and suggested that only someone from Aurangzeb's lineage would make such comments.
How did Congress respond to the controversy?
Reactions within Congress were mixed, with some emphasizing the need for careful word choice while others defended Reddy's comments in a broader context.
What is the significance of this controversy?
This incident highlights the ongoing tension between political parties regarding religious sentiments and the need for sensitive discourse in a diverse society.
What impact could this have on Telangana politics?
The backlash against Reddy's comments may influence public sentiment and affect the political dynamics within Telangana, especially concerning Hindu and minority relations.
