Did BJP Request to Cancel Pawan Khera's 'Duplicate' Vote?

Click to start listening
Did BJP Request to Cancel Pawan Khera's 'Duplicate' Vote?

Synopsis

In a significant political maneuver, the BJP has lodged a complaint with the Election Commission against Congress leader Pawan Khera, alleging he has an extra vote in New Delhi. This claim raises critical questions about voter registration integrity, especially as the BJP intensifies its scrutiny of Congress leaders' electoral practices.

Key Takeaways

  • BJP's complaint targets Khera's alleged duplicate vote.
  • Form 7 is used to contest wrongful entries in voter lists.
  • Allegations of multiple EPICs raise concerns over voter integrity.

New Delhi, Sep 3 (NationPress) The BJP has approached the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding Congress leader Pawan Khera, claiming that he possesses an additional vote in the national capital.

The complaint was submitted via Form 7 by a BJP Booth Level Agent (BLA), requesting the removal of what they termed Khera's "duplicate entry" in the electoral rolls.

In the application, BJP BLA Prashant Sharma has asked the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) of Assembly Constituency No. 40, New Delhi, to erase Khera's extra entry, citing the reason of "already enrolled".

The objection was lodged under Rule 13(2) and Rule 26 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, which govern the process of adding and removing names from the electoral rolls. The application specifically names Khera, residing at H. No. 3, NDMC Flats, Type-IV, Lodhi Road, Kaka Nagar, New Delhi (EPIC No. SJE0755967).

The BJP contended that Khera's name is already listed elsewhere in the electoral rolls, representing duplication that breaches election regulations.

Form 7 serves as a statutory mechanism that allows individuals, political parties, and BLAs to challenge the wrongful inclusion of names in voter lists. Reasons for objections can include death, change of residence, being underage, non-citizenship, or duplication from multiple registrations.

This action follows the BJP's escalated offensive against the Congress concerning the "voter theft campaign". After uncovering that Congress national spokesperson Khera possesses two voter IDs, the BJP subsequently directed its criticism towards his wife, also a Congress figure, for similarly holding "two active EPICs".

BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya commented on social media platform X, asserting that Pawan Khera's wife, Kota Neelima, who ran for office in the Khairatabad segment of Telangana, also has two active EPICs—one in Khairatabad and the other in New Delhi.

Malviya shared details of the two cards—EPIC Number: TDZ2666014 Assembly: 60-Khairatabad, active in 2023 and 2025; EPIC Number: SJE0755975 Assembly: 40-New Delhi—while questioning Rahul Gandhi's silence on this matter.

"Rahul Gandhi held a press conference and, without proper verification, targeted and defamed honest voters, even jeopardizing their safety by exposing their identities without consent. He doxxed young professionals and low-wage workers seeking better opportunities," he stated on X.

In attacking Gandhi, Malviya asserted that it is clear Congress leaders possess multiple EPIC numbers and are registered in more than one location, which is no coincidence.

Point of View

I believe that ensuring the integrity of voter registration is paramount for our democracy. The BJP's allegations against Pawan Khera highlight the importance of transparency in electoral processes. It is essential that we uphold the principles of fair representation and address any discrepancies in voter registration to maintain public trust in our electoral system.
NationPress
03/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the BJP alleging against Pawan Khera?
The BJP alleges that Pawan Khera holds an additional vote in New Delhi, which they claim constitutes a duplication in the electoral rolls.
What is Form 7 in the electoral process?
Form 7 is a legal document that allows individuals and political parties to contest the wrongful inclusion of names in voter lists based on various grounds, including duplication.
What are the implications of holding multiple EPICs?
Holding multiple EPICs can lead to questions about electoral integrity and may violate election laws, as it suggests possible duplication in voter registrations.