BJP defends police action on CEC Gyanesh Kumar protests, accuses Opposition of seeking regime change
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders on Saturday, 17 October 2026 mounted a sharp defence of police action against demonstrators protesting the continuation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, accusing the Opposition of escalating its demands from the CEC's removal to openly calling for regime change. The remarks came as detentions of protesters drew comparisons to the Emergency, a charge the BJP categorically rejected.
BJP Telangana Chief Defends Detentions
N. Ramchander Rao, President of the BJP's Telangana unit, said protesters were taken into custody for defying administrative directions and attempting to create public disturbances. 'Those trying to disturb peace, create anarchy and violate the law by ignoring administrative directions for protests are being taken into custody by the police as per the law,' Rao said.
Rao also claimed that businessmen and shopkeepers had approached the Supreme Court seeking the removal of the protest site from Jantar Mantar. He alleged that protesters had openly stated at a press conference their intent to create violence and seek regime change. 'Regime change happens through elections every five years, and people can fight on issues. Their intentions are dangerous, and the police are taking action,' he added.
Emergency Comparison Rejected
Responding to comparisons between the current police action and the Emergency of 1975, Rao criticised former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for making such remarks. He pointed out that the Emergency had been imposed by the Indian National Congress (Congress) government under late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, questioning why the party had taken that decision. The BJP has repeatedly sought to use this historical reference to deflect criticism of the present-day crackdown.
Flag Hoisting Row at Connaught Place
BJP leader Parkash Reddy separately addressed a planned protest by the Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) involving the hoisting of the National Flag at Connaught Place in New Delhi. Reddy said there was nothing objectionable about hoisting the Tricolour in a public park but stressed that insulting the National Flag was a punishable offence. 'Delhi Police has already issued notices prohibiting gatherings at Connaught Place due to public inconvenience and potential law-and-order problems,' he said.
National Spokesperson Targets Chidambaram
BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari also entered the fray, criticising senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram for defending the use of the phrase 'regime change.' Bhandari alleged that the Opposition had exposed what he called its 'anarchic intentions' and drew a parallel with political developments in Bangladesh, suggesting the Opposition was drawing inspiration from those events. Critics argue the BJP's framing is aimed at delegitimising constitutionally protected protest.
The Broader Context
The protests centre on demands for the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, with opposition groups alleging a lack of institutional independence at the Election Commission of India (ECI). The BJP has characterised these demands as a pattern of destabilisation, while Opposition leaders maintain the protests are a democratic exercise. This is not the first time protests at Jantar Mantar have sparked a political confrontation over the boundaries of dissent. All detentions remain subject to due legal process, according to official statements.
The standoff is likely to intensify ahead of upcoming state assembly cycles, with both sides framing the dispute as a test of democratic norms.