Is Canada Nurturing Terrorism by Allowing a Khalistan Embassy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
BJP spokesperson RP Singh sharply criticizes Canada's alleged endorsement of a ‘Khalistan Embassy’ in Surrey, labeling it a severe threat to international diplomatic norms. He raises alarms about extremism, urging swift action from India to safeguard its sovereignty.
Key Takeaways
- RP Singh criticizes Canada for allowing a 'Khalistan Embassy'.
- Calls it a “Serpentarium” fostering extremism.
- Warns against violations of the Vienna Convention.
- Urges immediate action from India's External Affairs Minister.
- Stresses zero tolerance for separatism.
New Delhi, Aug 5 (NationPress) The national spokesperson of the Bharatiya Janata Party and former Delhi MLA, RP Singh, issued a fierce statement against Canada on Tuesday, accusing the nation of facilitating extremism by allowing the creation of an alleged “Khalistan Embassy” in Surrey, British Columbia.
Describing it as a “Serpentarium,” Singh compared this action to fostering an environment conducive to separatist activities and cautioned that Canada’s decisions represent a significant threat to global diplomatic standards.
“This is not merely a lapse in judgment,” Singh remarked. “It constitutes a direct contravention of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which recognizes only the missions of sovereign states — not fictitious separatist entities.”
He recalled Hillary Clinton’s notable warning to Pakistan, stating: “You cannot harbor snakes in your backyard and anticipate they will only bite your neighbors. Ultimately, those snakes will turn on you.”
Singh contended that under the pretext of “freedom of expression,” Canada is sheltering extremist factions that have glorified terrorism, incited violence against India, and have even been associated with previous assassinations of Indian diplomats. “This is not a matter of free speech,” Singh stressed. “This is state-supported sedition against a friendly democracy.”
He called for urgent measures, urging External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar to lodge a robust diplomatic protest with the Canadian authorities. Singh also insisted on: “An official statement regarding the alleged 'Khalistan Embassy', withdrawal of any financial support to such separatist groups,” and “prompt action against those inciting violence against Indian institutions.”
“India has consistently demonstrated diplomatic acumen,” he asserted, “but there must be no tolerance for nations that support separatist agendas.”
In a concluding note directed at Canada, Singh posed the question: “Are you fostering democracy — or nurturing terrorism?” He reminded Ottawa that “India will not remain a passive observer when its sovereignty is disrespected on foreign soil.”
Point of View
It is crucial to address the implications of Singh's remarks on the broader diplomatic landscape. While concerns about extremism must be taken seriously, it is also essential to foster dialogue and understanding between nations. Upholding sovereignty is paramount, yet a balanced approach may yield better outcomes in the long run.
NationPress
08/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Khalistan movement?
The Khalistan movement advocates for an independent Sikh state in Punjab, India, often associated with extremism and separatist sentiments.
Why is the Khalistan Embassy controversial?
The Khalistan Embassy is controversial as it is perceived as a platform promoting separatism, which can undermine diplomatic relations and encourage extremism.
What did RP Singh say about Canada’s actions?
RP Singh condemned Canada for allegedly supporting extremism by allowing the establishment of the Khalistan Embassy, calling it a violation of diplomatic norms.
What is the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations?
The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations is an international treaty that defines a framework for diplomatic relations between independent countries.
What actions did Singh propose against Canada?
Singh urged the Indian government to lodge a strong protest with Canada and demanded the withdrawal of support for separatist entities.
