Karnataka BJP's Vijayendra slams Shivakumar over special Assembly session

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Karnataka BJP's Vijayendra slams Shivakumar over special Assembly session

Synopsis

Karnataka BJP chief B.Y. Vijayendra has publicly accused Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar of staging the special Assembly session as political theatre, claiming the ruling Congress's own MLAs admitted as much. With drought declarations allegedly skirting BJP constituencies, a ₹32,000 crore announcement without a clear funding source, and KSRTC reportedly unable to pay salaries, the BJP is building a multi-front accountability offensive heading into the legislative session.

Key Takeaways

BJP Karnataka president B.Y.
Vijayendra on 22 September accused CM D.K.
Shivakumar of convening the special Assembly session for political purposes.
Vijayendra alleged only 20 taluks across 44 constituencies were declared drought-hit, purportedly excluding BJP-held Bengaluru seats.
He demanded more than 190 taluks , including his own Shikaripura constituency, be declared drought-affected and called for a farm loan waiver.
The BJP questioned the funding source for ₹32,000 crore in projects announced by Shivakumar in Mangaluru.
KSRTC reportedly faces dues of ₹6,000–6,500 crore and warned the state government of a potential suspension of bus services.
Electricity procurement delay allegedly pushed per-unit costs from ₹10–11 to ₹14–15 , hurting farmers.

Karnataka Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President and MLA B.Y. Vijayendra on Tuesday, 22 September accused Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar of convening the special Assembly session as a political manoeuvre, alleging that the state government was exploiting issues such as drought relief and the Kasturirangan report for partisan purposes. Vijayendra made the remarks while speaking to reporters in Bengaluru.

The Core Accusation

Vijayendra alleged that Shivakumar had publicly claimed — both inside and outside the Assembly — that the special session was called to find genuine solutions to the drought crisis and the Kasturirangan report, free of political interference. He said the ruling Indian National Congress's own legislators had contradicted that claim.

'However, ruling party legislators themselves are saying that they took up the Kasturirangan issue and staged a padayatra in Shivamogga district because of the Chief Minister,' Vijayendra said. He further alleged that Shivakumar had been rattled by the BJP's padayatra and had therefore rushed to convene the special session. 'If the BJP had not conducted the padayatra, the Chief Minister would not have called this special session. He would have been sitting in Mangaluru catching fish,' he said.

Drought Declarations Under Scrutiny

Vijayendra questioned the state government's methodology for declaring drought-hit taluks, alleging that only 20 taluks had been designated drought-affected across 44 Assembly constituencies, purportedly excluding Bengaluru constituencies held by the BJP. He cited remarks by Muddebihal MLA Appaji Gowda, who had allegedly accused the state government of practising 'low-level politics' over the drought declarations. He also referenced a demand by senior Congress MLA H.K. Patil that his own constituency be included in the drought list, with Patil reportedly threatening to resign if it was not.

Vijayendra demanded that more than 190 taluks — including his own Shikaripura Assembly constituency in Shivamogga district — be declared drought-hit, and called for a farm loan waiver. He also noted that Janata Dal-Secular (JD-S) legislators had staged a protest over the same issue, suggesting discontent beyond the BJP alone.

Electricity Supply and Farmer Welfare

The BJP president alleged that the Congress government had failed to ensure adequate three-phase electricity supply to farmers. Recalling the previous BJP administration under B.S. Yediyurappa, he said power had been procured from Chhattisgarh to bridge supply gaps during that period. He argued that the current government should have anticipated the drought and purchased electricity earlier, adding that per-unit costs had reportedly risen from ₹10–11 to ₹14–15 due to delayed procurement.

Funding Questions and Fiscal Concerns

Vijayendra also questioned the source of funding for ₹32,000 crore worth of development projects announced by Shivakumar during a recent visit to Mangaluru. 'Do not make free announcements, Chief Minister. You announced ₹32,000 crore in Mangaluru. Tell us where the money will come from,' he said. He further flagged the financial position of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), claiming its Managing Director Sivakumar K.B. had written to the state government warning that the corporation — facing dues of around ₹6,000–6,500 crore — was struggling to pay salaries and could be forced to suspend bus services. He also raised concerns over the quality of shoes and socks supplied to schoolchildren under a state scheme, alleging the items were failing within a month despite being meant to last a year.

What Comes Next

Vijayendra said the BJP would raise all these issues during the ongoing Legislative session proceedings. The party's positioning signals a prolonged confrontation with the Shivakumar government over drought relief priorities, fiscal accountability, and welfare delivery in the run-up to local elections.

Point of View

Fiscal credibility, and welfare delivery are all live pressure points for the Shivakumar government. The allegation that Congress's own MLAs contradicted the Chief Minister's stated rationale for the session is the sharpest cut: internal incoherence is harder to defend than opposition attacks. The KSRTC dues figure — if accurate — points to a structural fiscal stress that the ₹32,000 crore Mangaluru announcement only deepens in credibility terms. What is missing from the BJP's critique, notably, is any concrete alternative policy prescription; the opposition appears focused on political attrition rather than a rival governance agenda.
NationPress
23 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the Karnataka BJP criticising the special Assembly session?
BJP president B.Y. Vijayendra has alleged that Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar convened the special session not to address drought or the Kasturirangan report in good faith, but as a political reaction to the BJP's own padayatra in Shivamogga. He cited statements by ruling Congress legislators as evidence that the session was politically motivated.
What is the Kasturirangan report controversy in Karnataka?
The Kasturirangan report relates to the delineation of ecologically sensitive areas in the Western Ghats, affecting land use and livelihoods in forest-fringe taluks. Vijayendra has demanded a physical survey to protect residents of these areas, arguing the current approach does not account for ground realities.
Which taluks has the BJP demanded be declared drought-hit?
Vijayendra demanded that more than 190 taluks be declared drought-affected, including his own Shikaripura constituency in Shivamogga district. He alleged the government's current list of 20 taluks across 44 constituencies was politically selective, leaving out Bengaluru constituencies held by the BJP.
What are the financial concerns raised about KSRTC and state projects?
Vijayendra claimed the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation faces outstanding dues of around ₹6,000–6,500 crore, with its Managing Director reportedly warning the state government of an inability to pay salaries and a possible halt to bus services. He also questioned the funding source for ₹32,000 crore in projects announced by Shivakumar in Mangaluru.
What is the BJP's position on farmer electricity supply in Karnataka?
The BJP has alleged that the Congress government failed to procure power early enough to cushion the drought impact on farmers, resulting in per-unit costs rising from ₹10–11 to ₹14–15. Vijayendra called on the state to immediately purchase electricity and ensure three-phase supply to agricultural users.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 3 days ago
  3. 4 days ago
  4. 2 weeks ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google