Did CCI Indict UltraTech in ONGC Tender Cartelisation Case?

Click to start listening
Did CCI Indict UltraTech in ONGC Tender Cartelisation Case?

Synopsis

The CCI's investigation into UltraTech and other cement firms reveals serious allegations of cartelisation with ONGC, raising questions about fair competition practices in India’s cement industry.

Key Takeaways

  • CCI investigation into cement companies for alleged cartelisation.
  • Financial documents mandated for compliance with competition laws.
  • Importance of fair competition for market integrity.
  • Potential penalties for non-compliance with CCI orders.
  • Key stakeholders involved in the investigation.

New Delhi, July 4 (NationPress) The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has instructed the Aditya Birla Group entity UltraTech, which controls India Cements, along with two other cement manufacturing firms and their executives, to provide financial documentation. This directive comes after the Director General's probe uncovered violations of competition laws through collusion in tenders issued by the state-run oil behemoth ONGC.

The CCI initiated this investigation following a complaint from ONGC, alleging that these cement companies engaged in cartelisation in response to the tenders they issued.

Findings from the investigation revealed that Umakant Agarwal, the owner of Sunrise Enterprises, facilitated collusion among these cement companies concerning ONGC tenders.

The competition authority has mandated that UltraTech submit financial statements for its subsidiary India Cements covering five years from FY15 to FY19, while Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements need to provide records for nine years, spanning FY11 to FY19.

Additionally, the CCI has required Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements to submit their audited financial statements, including balance sheets and profit and loss accounts, within eight weeks.

Moreover, their executives are expected to furnish detailed financials and income tax records for five years, alongside formal replies to the investigation report.

The Director General delivered its investigative report on February 18, 2025, revealing breaches of competition regulations.

On May 26, 2025, the CCI reviewed the investigation report and, in a four-page order, instructed the cement manufacturer to disclose income generated from sales linked to alleged violations by the public sector oil giant.

The notice warns that failure to provide financial details or submission of incomplete or false information within the stipulated time frame could result in liabilities under section 45 of the Act.

In December 2024, UltraTech Cements acquired a 32.72% stake from the promoters and associated entities of India Cements Ltd. This followed an earlier acquisition of a 22.77% stake from the market, establishing it as the majority stakeholder in the Tamil Nadu-based firm.

Meanwhile, UltraTech Cement Limited has announced the resignation of its Chief Legal Officer, Anoop Khatry, effective July 3, 2025, due to personal reasons.

Point of View

The CCI's actions underscore the importance of enforcing competition laws to ensure a fair market landscape. Upholding these regulations is vital for fostering healthy competition and safeguarding consumer interests across the nation.
NationPress
16/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggered the CCI investigation into UltraTech?
The investigation was initiated following a complaint from ONGC, alleging that UltraTech and other cement companies engaged in cartelisation during the tendering process.
What documents has CCI requested from UltraTech?
CCI has requested financial statements from UltraTech’s subsidiary India Cements for FY15 to FY19, along with other financial records from the involved companies.
What are the potential penalties for non-compliance?
Failure to provide the requested financial details or submitting inaccurate information could lead to liabilities under section 45 of the Competition Act.
What is the significance of the CCI's findings?
The findings highlight serious breaches of competition regulations, which could potentially reshape the operational norms within the cement industry.
Who is Umakant Agarwal?
Umakant Agarwal is identified as the proprietor of Sunrise Enterprises, who allegedly facilitated the collusion among the cement firms in the ONGC tenders.