Will the Madras HC Address the Plea Against Chennai Corporation's Private Sanitation Contract?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Madras High Court is hearing a significant petition today.
- The Greater Chennai Corporation has outsourced sanitation work, affecting thousands of workers.
- Protests have erupted against this decision, highlighting workers' concerns.
- The outcome of the case could impact future public sector employment practices.
- Worker rights and job security remain central to the ongoing discussions.
Chennai, Aug 12 (NationPress) The Madras High Court is set to hear a petition today challenging the Greater Chennai Corporation’s controversial decision to delegate sanitation duties in two zones to a private contractor, a move that has ignited significant protests among workers.
On June 16, the Corporation awarded a hefty Rs 276 crore cleaning services contract for Zones 5 and 6 to a private entity. The Workers’ Rights Movement, spearheaded by its president K. Bharathi, approached the High Court seeking to invalidate this resolution, asserting that the decision jeopardizes the livelihoods and job stability of thousands.
The petition highlights that 2,242 permanent workers are to be relocated to different zones, while 1,953 temporary workers will fall under the contractor’s management.
The petitioner argues that these employees will face the contractor’s conditions, leading to potential arbitrary dismissals, reduced pay, and loss of benefits.
Additional allegations claim that the outsourcing decision was taken without the necessary endorsement from the labour court, despite an associated case currently being in litigation.
The initiative has led to over 10 consecutive days of protests outside the Corporation’s Ripon Building headquarters, with sanitation workers and unions insisting on the cancellation of the contract.
Protesters accuse the civic authority of disregarding their concerns in favor of commercial interests over worker welfare.
When the issue was discussed on Monday, Advocate General P.S. Raman, representing the Corporation, sought more time to present an updated counter-affidavit. He noted that amendments had been made to a previous version, and the revised document needed the Commissioner’s signature before submission.
The petitioner’s counsel opposed any further delays, informing the court that “nearly 2,000 workers have been discarded like refuse” and urgently require relief. The counsel emphasized that extending the proceedings would exacerbate the struggles of those affected.
After considering both arguments, the court instructed that the matter be scheduled for hearing today and mandated the Corporation to submit its response without fail.
The ruling could have significant implications for the city’s sanitation management practices and the future of public sector employment in the civic workforce.