CM Sukhu: HP paid Rs 5 lakh to hold I-Day event on court terms
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Nearly 80 years after Independence, Himachal Pradesh had to pay Rs 5 lakh and seek a High Court order just to celebrate Independence Day on a public ground — and Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu is calling it out as a glaring injustice. The disclosure, made by the Chief Minister on Sunday, October 11, 2026, has put the spotlight on a rarely-discussed infrastructure crisis in India's mountain states.
What the High Court condition actually meant
In his post, CM Sukhu explained the peculiar bind hill states face: flat, open grounds are scarce in a terrain like Himachal Pradesh's, so schools and community grounds are routinely shared for public functions. This year, however, the state government could use a ground for the Independence Day ceremony only after the Himachal Pradesh High Court granted conditional permission — with a fee of five lakh rupees attached. The Chief Minister described the situation plainly: 'आज़ादी के इतने वर्षों बाद भी हमें स्वतंत्रता दिवस मनाने के लिए हाई कोर्ट के फैसले का सहारा लेना पड़े, तो यह न्यायोचित नहीं है' — 'Even after so many years of Independence, having to rely on a High Court order to celebrate Independence Day is not justified.'
The geography problem that politics ignored for decades
The Chief Minister's statement points to something structural. Unlike plains states, Himachal Pradesh has never had the luxury of large, dedicated parade grounds in most districts. Flat land is at a premium, and state and district administrations have historically depended on school playgrounds, maidans attached to courts, or shared civic spaces — all subject to competing institutional claims. The result, Sukhu argues, is that sovereign celebrations end up hostage to litigation schedules and conditional orders, an outcome he calls 'not just'.
A pointed political signal from Shimla
CM Sukhu stopped short of naming the court in adversarial terms — his criticism is directed at the systemic gap, not the judiciary. The framing, nonetheless, is unmistakably political: by highlighting that the state had to pay Rs 5 lakh and secure judicial clearance to host a constitutional celebration, he is building a public case for dedicated government land for civic and state functions in the hills. It is a quiet but sharp demand — and one that resonates in every mountain constituency where infrastructure promises have lagged for generations.
If a state government cannot unfurl the national flag on its own terms without a court fee, the question Sukhu is really asking is this: what exactly did the state inherit at Independence?