Is There a New Controversy at Sabarimala Temple Over Gold Plating Removal?

Click to start listening
Is There a New Controversy at Sabarimala Temple Over Gold Plating Removal?

Synopsis

A recent controversy has erupted at Sabarimala Temple over the unauthorized removal of gold plating from Dwarapalaka sculptures. The Special Commissioner’s report raises serious questions about protocol and transparency in temple management. This incident has revived debates regarding the economic implications of gold and its condition.

Key Takeaways

  • Gold plating was removed from Dwarapalaka sculptures without court approval.
  • The action has sparked a debate about protocol adherence in temple management.
  • There are concerns about the economic implications of aging gold.
  • The incident has revived scrutiny over the Travancore Devaswom Board's transparency.
  • Sabarimala remains a significant pilgrimage site, drawing millions each year.

Thiruvananthapuram, Sep 9 (NationPress) A new controversy has arisen at Sabarimala after the Special Commissioner notified the Kerala High Court that the gold plating on the Dwarapalaka sculptures surrounding the sanctum sanctorum was taken down and sent to Chennai without the required judicial permission.

The report from the Commissioner indicated that the High Court had previously ordered that all gold-related activities at the shrine must be conducted solely at the Sannidhanam and under strict supervision by court-appointed officials.

This deviation was noted in the report as a significant breach of established protocol.

In defense of the action, the President of the Travancore Devaswom Board, P.S. Prashanth, stated that the removal was carried out with the approval of the temple Thantri (chief priest) due to observable damage to the sculptures.

“There were signs of tarnishing, scratches, and even cracks in the legs. It was essential to conduct repairs before the Mandalam season. The removal was supervised by the Thiruvabharanam Commissioner and vigilance officials,” he clarified.

This incident has reignited ongoing discussions regarding the economic value of aging gold.

Some assert that gold exposed to the elements may undergo changes that increase its worth.

Critics argue that even if the original plates are replaced with an equal weight of new gold, there may be undisclosed financial advantages.

This is not the first occurrence of such allegations against Sabarimala.

Previously, when the temple roof was dismantled and re-gilded, concerns about transparency were raised.

The recent removal took place discreetly following the Onam pujas, during the temple's closure, which has further fueled doubts.

As this new controversy is now before the court, scrutiny regarding the Devaswom Board's management of temple assets is anticipated to increase in the upcoming weeks.

Located in the Western Ghats in the Pathanamthitta district, Sabarimala is among India's most revered and frequently visited pilgrimage sites, attracting millions of devotees annually.

Perched at an elevation of 3,000 feet, Sabarimala traditionally requires pilgrims to undergo a 41-day period of penance followed by a barefoot journey from the banks of the Pampa River.

Point of View

I believe that transparency and adherence to protocol are paramount, especially in matters involving religious and cultural heritage. This incident must be scrutinized to ensure that trust is maintained among the devotees and the general public. The handling of temple assets should reflect accountability and respect for both tradition and law.
NationPress
09/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggered the recent controversy at Sabarimala?
The controversy began when it was reported that the gold plating on the Dwarapalaka sculptures was removed and transported without court permission.
Who defended the removal of the gold plating?
The President of the Travancore Devaswom Board, P.S. Prashanth, defended the removal, claiming it was necessary due to damage to the sculptures.
What are the implications of the gold removal?
The removal has raised concerns about adherence to protocol, transparency, and the economic value of the gold involved.