Why Are There Discrepancies in the Two Post-Mortem Reports of the BJP Workers' Deaths?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Calcutta High Court's scrutiny of the conflicting post-mortem reports regarding the deaths of two BJP workers raises serious questions about the investigation's integrity. With calls for further examination and accountability, this case highlights the need for transparency and justice in sensitive matters.
Key Takeaways
- Calcutta High Court questions inconsistencies in post-mortem reports.
- First report classified deaths as electrocution.
- Second report revealed injuries on the victims.
- Calls for police to investigate the accused's communication.
- Importance of witness testimonies under scrutiny.
Kolkata, Sep 3 (NationPress) The Calcutta High Court raised concerns regarding the discrepancies between two post-mortem reports concerning the enigmatic deaths of two BJP workers in Khejuri, located in the East Midnapore district of West Bengal, during July this year.
The division bench, comprising Justice Debangshu Basak and Justice Shabbar Rashidi, instructed the police to present the call records of 17 individuals identified as suspects in the case by the next hearing date.
On July 12, two BJP workers, Sujit Das and Sujit Paik, tragically passed away while attending a local cultural event in Khejuri, their place of residence. Following the initial post-mortem report, authorities classified the deaths as resulting from electrocution.
However, the families of the deceased alleged that the two BJP workers had been murdered, prompting them to petition the Calcutta High Court for a second autopsy.
In response to the court's directive, a second autopsy was performed at the state-run S.S.K.M. Medical College & Hospital in Kolkata, revealing injury marks on the bodies of both workers.
During the hearing on Wednesday, the division bench expressed their concerns regarding the inconsistencies in the two post-mortem reports.
Justice Basak questioned how the second report could indicate injury marks when the first report did not mention any. He remarked on the shocking nature of the incident occurring at a public event without any witnesses, suggesting that potential witnesses appeared to be intimidated.
“Differences in the two autopsy reports naturally lead to doubt. The police must examine the mobile devices of all individuals accused to obtain their call recordings. At the very least, an investigation should commence against the 17 suspects named in the complaint,” stated Justice Basak.
Point of View
It is imperative to ensure that justice prevails in this case. The stark differences in the autopsy reports raise valid concerns about the investigation's integrity. Our commitment remains with the truth, and we advocate for a transparent investigation to uphold the principles of justice.
NationPress
03/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Calcutta High Court to question the post-mortem reports?
The court raised concerns over disparities in the findings of two post-mortem reports regarding the deaths of two BJP workers, highlighting the need for a thorough investigation.
What were the initial findings of the first post-mortem report?
The first post-mortem report indicated that the deaths were due to 'electrocution'.
What did the second post-mortem report reveal?
The second report, conducted after a court order, revealed injury marks on the bodies of the deceased.
What actions did the Calcutta High Court instruct the police to take?
The court directed the police to submit call records of the 17 accused individuals by the next hearing and to investigate the discrepancies in the post-mortem reports.
Why is this case significant?
This case is significant as it raises questions about the transparency and reliability of investigations into sensitive incidents involving political figures.
