Delhi arson: 17-year-old among four held for Tughlakabad fire that killed 3
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A deadly fire that gutted a five-storey residential building in Delhi's Tughlakabad Extension in the early hours of 12 June, killing three people and injuring at least eight, was a deliberate act of arson rooted in personal enmity, police confirmed on Sunday, 14 June. Four accused — including a 17-year-old minor girl — have been apprehended in connection with the case.
How the Fire Was Set
The blaze was reported at 2:24 a.m. on Friday at a building in Tughlakabad Extension, under the Govindpuri area of south Delhi. CCTV footage reviewed during the investigation showed a woman entering the premises shortly before the fire erupted, leading investigators to classify the incident as a 'deliberate act of arson'.
According to police, the 17-year-old was allegedly instigated by one Sarita, aged 27, to supply petrol and a matchbox with the stated intent of burning the scooter of a building resident named Deepak over a monetary dispute. The fire, however, spread to the entire structure.
The Conspiracy Behind the Attack
During interrogation, Sarita reportedly disclosed that the conspiracy was planned at the behest of Niranjan, a 33-year-old resident of Navjeevan Camp, Govind Puri, and his 27-year-old brother Rajkumar, to settle a personal score. Investigators have since added multiple charges to the case, including Section 61 (Criminal Conspiracy), Section 105 (Culpable Homicide), Section 110 (Attempt to Culpable Homicide), Section 326(g) (Mischief by Fire), and Section 331(4) (Lurking House-Trespass by Night) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Victims Identified
The three people who lost their lives have been identified as Pankaj and Sonia Kumari, both children of Subhash Chand Pandey, and Sushila Devi. At least eight others sustained injuries and were rushed to Safdarjung Hospital and the AIIMS Trauma Centre.
Rescue Challenges and Ongoing Probe
Delhi Fire Services (DFS) Assistant Divisional Officer Yashwant Singh Meena had earlier noted that the building — comprising a ground floor and five upper floors — was situated in a narrow lane, which posed significant challenges for both rescue teams and firefighting operations. The initial case was registered under Sections 287 and 106(1) BNS (erstwhile Sections 304A and 285 IPC) before additional charges were added following the arson findings.
Police said the investigation is continuing, with authorities examining the full chain of the alleged conspiracy.