Will the Delhi HC Rule on Kejriwal and Sisodia's Liquor Scam Pleas?

Click to start listening
Will the Delhi HC Rule on Kejriwal and Sisodia's Liquor Scam Pleas?

Synopsis

The Delhi High Court is poised to hear significant petitions from Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia regarding the liquor scam. With allegations of corruption and misappropriation, this case has far-reaching implications for AAP leaders. The outcome could reshape the political landscape as they challenge the ED's actions and seek to halt trial proceedings.

Key Takeaways

  • Delhi HC to review significant pleas on liquor scam.
  • Kejriwal and Sisodia challenge trial court's decision.
  • Allegations include misappropriation of over Rs 2,026 crore.
  • CAG report raises concerns over policy transparency.
  • Political implications could reshape AAP's future.

New Delhi, May 4 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court is set to consider a plea on Monday from former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, challenging the trial court's action in acknowledging the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) prosecution complaint concerning the purported liquor policy scam.

According to the causelist available on the Delhi HC website, a single-judge Bench led by Justice Ravinder Dudeja will examine Kejriwal's plea on May 5, alongside a similar motion filed by senior AAP leader and former Deputy CM Manish Sisodia.

Both Kejriwal and Sisodia have submitted separate petitions to the Delhi High Court, seeking a halt to trial proceedings on the grounds that the trial court had acknowledged the alleged offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) without prior sanction from the ED for prosecution.

With the Union Home Ministry granting the ED authority to prosecute Kejriwal and Sisodia regarding the alleged liquor scam, the ongoing petitions may become irrelevant, leaving the AAP leaders with limited options, possibly requiring them to file new proceedings against the sanction.

During a past hearing, while awaiting the competent authority's approval for sanction, the ED argued before the Delhi HC that since the alleged act of money laundering did not fall under the category of 'discharge of their official duties', both the former CM and Dy CM could be prosecuted without needing sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

In December of the previous year, Kejriwal’s attorney had contested the adjournment requested on behalf of the ED due to the absence of Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju, advocating for an expedited hearing in light of the upcoming Delhi Assembly elections. Subsequently, a Bench led by Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri scheduled the matter for January 30, but Kejriwal's plea was postponed multiple times due to time constraints, as noted in the order sheet on the Delhi High Court's website.

Central agencies allege that Kejriwal, along with other AAP leaders, received bribes from the 'South Group', a cartel purportedly controlling liquor sales and profiting from the Delhi government's 2021-22 excise policy. It is claimed they misappropriated over Rs 2,026 crore as the liquor excise policy lacked transparency and was rife with illicit decision-making favoring select licensees, according to a recent report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).

The auditor's report indicated that the government lost approximately Rs 890 crore due to the AAP government's failure to re-tender surrendered retail liquor licenses.

The CAG report raised significant concerns regarding the AAP government’s policy formulation and execution, highlighting several irregularities such as lack of pricing transparency, violations during license issuance and renewal, failure to penalize offenders, and neglecting to seek approval from the L-G, Cabinet, or Assembly. The report also mentioned an additional loss of Rs 941 crore due to exemptions granted to zonal licensees. It accused the Group of Ministers, led by Sisodia, of disregarding the recommendations of the expert panel and permitting disqualified entities to bid for licenses.

While on bail, former CM Kejriwal has denied all allegations, asserting that the BJP is utilizing central agencies to target political adversaries.

Point of View

This case underscores the ongoing tensions between political entities and law enforcement agencies. The allegations against Kejriwal and Sisodia raise critical questions about governance, accountability, and the potential misuse of power. The judicial proceedings will be watched closely, reflecting the delicate balance of justice and political dynamics in India.
NationPress
26/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Delhi High Court set to hear?
The Delhi High Court is set to hear pleas from Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia challenging the trial court's acceptance of the Enforcement Directorate's prosecution complaint in the alleged liquor scam.
What allegations are against Kejriwal and Sisodia?
They are accused of accepting bribes from a cartel controlling liquor sales, allegedly misappropriating over Rs 2,026 crore through the Delhi government's excise policy.
What is the significance of the CAG report?
The CAG report highlighted serious irregularities in the AAP government's liquor policy, detailing losses to the exchequer and questioning the transparency and legality of decisions made.
How might the Home Ministry's sanction affect the case?
The sanction granted by the Home Ministry could render the ongoing petitions irrelevant, possibly leading Kejriwal and Sisodia to file new proceedings against this sanction.
What is the stance of Kejriwal on the allegations?
Kejriwal has denied the allegations, claiming that the BJP is exploiting central agencies to undermine political opponents.