Delhi cyber stalker arrested for fake Instagram accounts, obscene content
Synopsis
A Delhi man allegedly spent over three years creating fake Instagram profiles in a woman's name, sending obscene material to her husband and contacts — and each time Meta took the accounts down, he opened new ones. The arrest by North-East District's Cyber Police Station exposes how persistent digital harassment can evade platform safeguards and why dedicated cyber cells are increasingly critical.
Key Takeaways
Jeetu Kumar , 27 , a resident of New Ashok Nagar, Delhi , was arrested on 26 August 2026 by the Cyber Police Station, North-East District.
Kumar allegedly created multiple fake Instagram accounts using the victim's name and photographs to circulate obscene material to her husband and acquaintances.
The case was registered as FIR No.
22/2026 under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act .
Investigators obtained account registration data from Meta , tracing the fake profiles to a mobile number registered in Kumar's name.
Kumar reportedly began following the victim in 2022 and repeatedly created new accounts each time existing ones were removed by Meta.
One mobile phone used in the offence was recovered; Kumar has no prior criminal record, according to police.
The Cyber Police Station of Delhi's North-East District on Wednesday, 26 August 2026, arrested a 27-year-old man for allegedly stalking and defaming a woman by creating multiple fake Instagram accounts in her name and using them to circulate obscene material to her husband and acquaintances. The accused has been identified as Jeetu Kumar, a resident of New Ashok Nagar, Delhi.
How the Crime Unfolded
According to police, the case was registered as FIR No. 22/2026 under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, following a complaint by a woman residing in North-East Delhi. The complainant reported that an unidentified person had been repeatedly harassing and mentally tormenting her through social media platforms.
Kumar allegedly created fake Instagram profiles using the victim's name and photographs, making the accounts appear authentic. He then used these profiles to send pornographic and obscene videos and images to her husband and others in her social circle. The stated objective, according to police, was to defame the woman and cause her severe mental distress.
The Investigation Trail
A dedicated police team — led by Inspector Rahul Kumar, SHO of the Cyber Police Station, North-East District, along with SI Mohit, HC Sandeep, and Ct. Kapil Sharma — conducted a detailed technical investigation. The team obtained account registration details from Meta, the parent company of Instagram.
Analysis of the data revealed that the fake accounts were created and operated using a mobile number registered in the name of Jeetu Kumar. Acting on these technical leads, police conducted raids and apprehended the accused. One mobile phone, allegedly used to create and operate the fake accounts, was recovered from his possession.
Key Details of the Accused
During interrogation, Kumar reportedly admitted that he was known to the victim and had been following her since 2022 — a span of over three years. He created multiple fake Instagram IDs using her name and photographs as profile pictures. Notably, each time the fake accounts were reported to Meta and taken down, he allegedly created new ones and resumed the activity — a pattern that underscores the persistence of the harassment.
Police confirmed that Kumar has no prior criminal record. Further investigation into the case is ongoing.
Broader Context
This arrest comes amid a documented rise in cyber-stalking and image-based abuse cases across Indian metropolitan cities. Crimes involving fake social media profiles to harass women have grown increasingly common, prompting police departments to establish dedicated cyber cells. The use of Section 67A of the IT Act — which addresses the electronic transmission of sexually explicit material — reflects law enforcement's growing reliance on digital-era statutes to prosecute such offences. This is among the first such arrests logged under this provision in the North-East District in 2026.
Point of View
And each time Meta's moderation removed his fake accounts, he simply created new ones. That cycle lasted years before law enforcement intervened, raising a pointed question: what is the threshold at which platform-level action triggers a proactive alert to authorities? India's cyber cells are understaffed relative to the volume of such complaints, and Section 67A, while applicable, was not designed with the repeat-account-creation pattern in mind. Closing that gap — between platform takedowns and police notification — is the structural fix this case demands.
NationPress
26 Aug 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was arrested in the Delhi fake Instagram stalking case?
Jeetu Kumar , a 27-year-old resident of New Ashok Nagar, Delhi , was arrested by the Cyber Police Station of Delhi's North-East District on 26 August 2026 . He is accused of creating multiple fake Instagram accounts to harass and defame a woman.
What charges have been filed against the accused?
The case has been registered as FIR No. 22/2026 under Section 67A of the Information Technology Act , which pertains to the electronic transmission of sexually explicit material. Further investigation is underway.
How did police identify and catch Jeetu Kumar?
Police obtained account registration details from Meta and found that the fake Instagram profiles were created using a mobile number registered in Kumar's name. Acting on this technical evidence, a team led by Inspector Rahul Kumar conducted raids and arrested him, also recovering the mobile phone used in the offence.
How long had the harassment been going on?
According to police, Kumar had been following the victim since 2022 — over three years before his arrest. He repeatedly created new fake accounts each time existing ones were reported and removed by Meta.
Does the accused have a prior criminal record?
No. Police confirmed that Jeetu Kumar has no previous criminal involvement. The investigation into the case is continuing.
