Did DEO Patna Just Disprove Tejashwi Yadav’s Missing Name Claim?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav's claim of his name missing from Bihar's electoral roll has been firmly refuted by Patna's DEO, who confirms his presence in the updated voter list. This incident raises questions about voter verification and the integrity of electoral processes.
Key Takeaways
- Tejashwi Yadav's claim was officially denied by the DEO.
- His name is listed on the electoral roll at Serial Number 416.
- The incident highlights the importance of verifying electoral information.
- Political accusations may impact public trust in electoral processes.
- Claims can be scrutinized during the ongoing voter verification period.
Patna, Aug 2 (NationPress) The political uproar initiated by RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav’s assertion on Saturday about the absence of his name from Bihar's electoral roll has taken a dramatic twist. The District Electoral Officer (DEO) of Patna has firmly denied this claim, confirming that Tejashwi Yadav’s name is indeed included in the latest voter list.
In a statement shared via social media platform X, the DEO’s office declared: “Tejashwi Yadav’s assertion that his name is absent from the electoral roll following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is incorrect. His name is recorded at Serial Number 416, with polling booth number 204—Veterinary College, Patna.”
The office also requested Tejashwi to verify information before making public declarations that could mislead voters.
“Intentional efforts to mislead the electorate must be addressed,” the statement emphasized.
Earlier that day, Tejashwi Yadav created a stir during a press conference, claiming—based on a real-time check on the Election Commission app—that his name had been removed from the voter list.
“If I am not listed, it implies I am not a resident of Bihar and therefore can’t contest elections,” he remarked sarcastically, while accusing the Election Commission of operating a “fake app.”
Yadav further claimed that the names of numerous voters were removed in a non-transparent, politically motivated manner during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision process, alleging that this was evidenced by the absence of names for RJD staff, government officials, and everyday voters.
The inconsistency between Tejashwi’s real-time demonstration and the DEO’s official statement has sparked new inquiries regarding the reliability of the Election Commission’s mobile application compared to its official voter records.
Election officials have yet to investigate if any technical issues with the app led to a temporary error or if the problem arose from how voter data was accessed during the press conference.
This incident arises amidst growing scrutiny over the removal of more than 6.5 million names from the voter list in Bihar, igniting allegations of voter suppression and political manipulation.
Yadav charged the Election Commission with acting under political pressure, labeling it a “Godi Commission.”
However, the DEO’s response may offer relief to the electoral body while also compelling the Opposition to back its claims with reliable evidence.
As the window for submitting claims and objections remains open until September 1, 2025, political analysts suggest this situation could either escalate into a larger credibility conflict or dissipate if Tejashwi acknowledges the clarification.
Point of View
It is crucial to emphasize that electoral integrity is paramount. The DEO's clarification serves as a reminder that public figures must base their claims on verified data. Maintaining trust in the electoral process is essential for democracy, and both sides should focus on transparency and accountability.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Tejashwi Yadav's claim regarding the voters' list?
Tejashwi Yadav claimed that his name was missing from the electoral roll of Bihar.
How did the DEO of Patna respond to Yadav's claim?
The DEO of Patna confirmed that Tejashwi Yadav’s name is indeed present in the updated voter list.
What implications does this incident have for the electoral process?
This incident raises concerns about the reliability of voter verification processes and showcases the necessity for accurate information dissemination.
What is the deadline for submitting claims and objections regarding the voters' list?
The deadline for submitting claims and objections is September 1, 2025.
How might this situation affect the credibility of the Election Commission?
The contradiction between the claims made by Yadav and the DEO’s rebuttal could lead to scrutiny of the Election Commission’s processes and its mobile application.
