Has the Complainant Chinnaiah, the Mask Man, Been Granted Bail in the Dharmasthala Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a dramatic twist, bail has been granted to Chinnaiah, the complainant known as the masked man, in the notorious Dharmasthala case. This development raises numerous questions about the ongoing investigation and the serious accusations surrounding it. How will this impact the case moving forward?
Key Takeaways
- Bail granted to Chinnaiah, the complainant in the Dharmasthala case.
- Chinnaiah was accused of misleading the SIT.
- The court imposed 12 conditions for his bail.
- His shocking allegations have triggered public outrage.
- Calls for a higher-level investigation are growing.
Mangaluru, Nov 24 (NationPress) In a significant turn of events, a local court in Mangaluru district of Karnataka has granted bail to the complainant Chinnaiah, popularly known as the masked man, on Monday in relation to the high-profile Dharmasthala case.
Chinnaiah faced arrest for allegedly misleading the Special Investigation Team (SIT) that is investigating the case.
Following the SIT's report submission to the Belthangady court, Chinnaiah swiftly filed a bail application, which was subsequently approved by the district court in Mangaluru.
The court has set forth 12 conditions for his bail, including the requirement to execute a Rs 1 lakh bond.
Chinnaiah, referred to as the masked man, was arrested on August 23 in connection with the alleged murders in Dharmasthala.
He was implicated for providing false information to the authorities. The SIT interrogated him for over 15 hours starting from August 22, concluding that his statements misled the ongoing investigation.
On July 11, Chinnaiah, then an unidentified complainant, appeared in a Mangaluru court to record his statement.
He alleged he was coerced into burying the bodies of women and girls who had been raped and murdered in Dharmasthala.
He requested that the bodies be exhumed in his presence, asserting the victims exhibited clear signs of sexual assault. According to him, the bodies were discovered devoid of clothing and showed signs of violent abuse.
These shocking claims reverberated throughout Karnataka.
In light of his allegations, a retired Supreme Court judge along with various activists has called for a Supreme Court– or High Court–supervised investigation into the alleged Dharmasthala murders, which may implicate multiple victims, including women, girls, and vulnerable men.
Moreover, Chinnaiah, previously branded as a whistleblower, reportedly submitted a skull—which he claimed was recovered from one of the burial sites—to the SIT.
Although he was initially granted protection under the Witness Protection Act and provided necessary support, police sources have confirmed that this protection has now been revoked.
Point of View
It is our duty to present this story with utmost integrity. The bail granted to Chinnaiah, amidst serious allegations of misleading the investigation, raises significant concerns about the integrity of the judicial process and the ongoing investigation into the Dharmasthala case. We will continue to report on the developments as they unfold.
NationPress
24/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the charges against Chinnaiah?
Chinnaiah has been charged with misleading the Special Investigation Team (SIT) investigating the Dharmasthala case.
What conditions were set for Chinnaiah's bail?
The court granted bail with 12 conditions, including the execution of a Rs 1 lakh bond.
Why is the Dharmasthala case significant?
The Dharmasthala case involves serious allegations of murder and sexual assault, which have shocked the entire state of Karnataka.
What happened to the protection provided to Chinnaiah?
Reports indicate that the protection granted to Chinnaiah under the Witness Protection Act has been revoked.
What is the public response to Chinnaiah's claims?
Chinnaiah's allegations have prompted calls for a Supreme Court or High Court-monitored investigation into the case.
