Is Umar Khalid Innocent? Digvijaya Singh Demands His Release and Accuses BJP-RSS of Targeting Muslims
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold move, former Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh has declared Umar Khalid innocent, igniting heated discussions on justice and political agendas. As the Supreme Court hears Khalid's bail plea, Singh's accusations against the BJP-RSS bring to light the complex issues surrounding minority rights in India.
Key Takeaways
- Digvijaya Singh calls for the immediate release of Umar Khalid.
- Singh asserts Khalid is innocent and a victim of injustice.
- The BJP and RSS are accused of conspiring against Muslims.
- Ongoing Supreme Court hearings on Khalid's bail plea.
- Political ramifications may influence public opinion on justice and minority rights.
Bhopal, Nov 3 (NationPress) Senior Congress leader and former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh has ignited a significant political controversy by asserting that Umar Khalid, the ex-JNU PhD scholar imprisoned in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots, is "completely innocent" and a victim of "grave injustice".
In a provocative Facebook post that has gained traction, Singh called for Khalid's immediate release, portraying him as a brilliant academic rather than a "traitor".
He shared this post while linking to an article titled “Ek Itihaskar Ki Bat”, which discussed the research Khalid was involved in.
The Congress leader also shared some news that those who recently wrote “I Love Mohammad” on a temple wall in Aligarh have been arrested, all of whom are Hindus.
Singh's post emphasizes: "Umar Khalid is innocent and suffers from a serious injustice. He is a PhD scholar, not a traitor by any means. He should be freed immediately."
In a subsequent post, he remarked, “The BJP and RSS are orchestrating this conspiracy to falsely accuse Muslims. Jai Siya Ram.”
This statement comes amid ongoing Supreme Court hearings on Khalid's bail plea, where he has been detained for over five years under the stringent UAPA.
Khalid, who is implicated in the broader conspiracy behind the north-east Delhi riots that resulted in 53 fatalities, has faced multiple bail denials.
His legal representatives argue that prolonged detention contravenes the principle that "bail is the rule, jail the exception", particularly for undertrial cases.
The BJP quickly denounced Singh, branding his defense as "anti-national" and indicative of Congress' support for "riot orchestrators".
The Congress veteran, known for his criticisms of the RSS, has previously likened their targeting of Muslims to Hitler’s persecution of Jews, describing India as an "open-air prison" for minorities under oppressive laws like the UAPA.
Supporters view his post as a courageous stance against "institutional bias", where bail is consistently denied to Muslim defendants while others are released.
Conversely, critics interpret it as a strategy for vote-bank politics, especially given Singh's history of defending activists involved in the Bhima Koregaon and anti-CAA protests.
As the Supreme Court hearings resume, Singh's remarks may sway public opinion regarding the balance between liberty and security.
Point of View
Digvijaya Singh’s statements reflect a significant divergence in political ideology concerning minority rights and justice. His accusations against the BJP-RSS underscore the ongoing tensions in Indian society, particularly regarding the treatment of Muslims. While many view his defense of Khalid as a necessary stand against perceived injustice, others criticize it as opportunistic politics ahead of elections. The discourse surrounding this issue is crucial for understanding the current socio-political climate in India.
NationPress
25/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Umar Khalid?
Umar Khalid is a former PhD scholar at JNU who was jailed in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots case.
What is the UAPA?
The UAPA, or Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, is a law in India that allows for the detention of individuals suspected of terrorism and acts against the integrity of the nation.
Why is Digvijaya Singh advocating for Khalid's release?
Singh claims Khalid is innocent and a victim of grave injustice, suggesting that his detention is politically motivated.
How has the BJP responded to Singh's statements?
The BJP has condemned Singh's comments, labeling them as 'anti-national' and indicative of Congress' sympathy for those involved in the riots.
What impact could this situation have on public opinion?
Singh's statements may influence the discourse on minority rights and judicial fairness in India, especially as the Supreme Court hearings continue.
