Why Are Chief Secretaries Ignoring Stray Dog Management Directives?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court's Directive: Compliance affidavits required from Chief Secretaries.
- ABC Rules Implementation: Focus on sterilization and vaccination programs.
- Consequences of Non-compliance: Possible penalties for Chief Secretaries.
- Public Image: Ongoing stray dog issues affect India's reputation.
- Need for Accountability: Governance accountability in animal welfare is crucial.
New Delhi, Oct 27 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has summoned the Chief Secretaries of all states and Union Territories, excluding West Bengal and Telangana, for their failure to submit compliance affidavits regarding earlier directives on managing stray dogs.
A bench consisting of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria expressed dissatisfaction over the inaction of most state governments, which have not filed compliance affidavits detailing their efforts to implement the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, despite clear instructions issued in August.
“Didn’t these officials keep up with current affairs? Even if they were not formally served, the affidavit should have been submitted. All Chief Secretaries must appear in person on November 3,” remarked the Justice Nath-led bench.
The Supreme Court highlighted that only the governments of West Bengal, Telangana, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) had complied with the order.
“Ongoing incidents are affecting the country’s image abroad. We also see the news reports,” the bench stated.
The court also criticized a number of intervention applications from various residents’ welfare associations (RWAs) and individuals wanting to be involved in the case.
“If every RWA wishes to join as a party, we will be overwhelmed with a multitude of parties,” the Justice Nath-led bench noted, adding, “Please provide reasonable suggestions.”
The Supreme Court warned that coercive measures and penalties would be imposed if the Chief Secretaries do not appear for the next hearing.
Pointing out that the report from the MCD was insufficient, the bench demanded an explanation from the Chief Secretary of Delhi regarding the absence of a compliance affidavit.
“The Chief Secretary must provide an explanation... otherwise, penalties may be enforced and coercive actions taken,” the apex court remarked.
In an order issued on August 22, the Supreme Court directed all states and Union Territories to report on their adherence to the ABC Rules, including details of sterilization programs, vaccination initiatives, and available infrastructure for dog shelters and pounds.
The next hearing is scheduled for November 3, when the Chief Secretaries are expected to appear before the apex court.