Is there a need to investigate the Nehru family's links with China?

Click to start listening
Is there a need to investigate the Nehru family's links with China?

Synopsis

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has sparked controversy by demanding an investigation into the alleged ties between the Nehru-Gandhi family and China, referencing declassified documents from the 1961 Belgrade Summit. This bold claim raises questions about India's historical decisions and their impact on current geopolitical relations.

Key Takeaways

  • Nishikant Dubey calls for an investigation into the Nehru family's alleged ties with China.
  • The demand is based on declassified documents from the 1961 Belgrade Summit.
  • Dubey questions the effectiveness of Nehru's non-alignment strategy.
  • The Non-Aligned Movement aimed to keep nations independent from major power blocs.
  • Criticism of the Nehru-Gandhi family's policies includes claims of favoring Pakistan.

New Delhi, June 9 (NationPress) In a pointed criticism of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has called for a formal inquiry into the purported historical connections between the Nehru-Gandhi family and China. This demand was sparked by revelations from declassified documents related to the 1961 Belgrade Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM).

In a vehement post on X this Monday, Dubey scrutinized the strategic choices made by India’s inaugural Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru.

“Rahul Baba, are you aware that your family’s patriarch, Nehru ji, devised the new concept of non-alignment at the behest of China? Look at the nations represented at the first conference in Belgrade in 1961. After distancing India from both Russia and America, did any nation come to India’s aid during or after the 1962 war with China?” Dubey questioned.

He further asserted that the Non-Aligned Movement, which Nehru played a pivotal role in establishing, ultimately benefited China.

Invoking the 26th declaration of the Belgrade Summit, Dubey claimed the document showcased Nehru’s alignment with Beijing. “From Tibet to China, Panchsheel for China, and after designating China as a permanent member of the United Nations, this conference mandated the UN to acknowledge China as the sole representative state. By siding with China, did your family not impose the 1962 war on India?” he stated.

He then posed a direct inquiry to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi: “Should we investigate the relationship between China and the Nehru family?”

The Belgrade Summit, conducted in September 1961, marked the first formal assembly of the Non-Aligned Movement—an alliance of nations aspiring to remain neutral from both the Western and Soviet spheres during the Cold War. Under Nehru’s leadership, India was instrumental in shaping the movement’s principles and objectives.

Previously, Dubey accused the Nehru-Gandhi family of favoring Pakistan at the expense of India in relation to the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). He highlighted India’s financial contributions to Pakistan under this treaty, implying that the Gandhi family's policies have been harmful to India’s interests.

Point of View

I believe it’s essential to investigate any claims that may shed light on historical ties affecting our national interest. However, it’s equally crucial to ensure that these inquiries are based on credible evidence rather than political motivations. The discourse must remain focused on fostering constructive dialogue around India's foreign policy.
NationPress
30/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Nishikant Dubey accuse the Nehru family of?
Nishikant Dubey accused the Nehru family of having historical ties with China and favoring Pakistan over India's interests.
What is the significance of the Belgrade Summit?
The Belgrade Summit in 1961 was the first formal meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement, aimed at maintaining independence from Western and Soviet influences during the Cold War.
Why is the investigation into the Nehru family's ties with China being demanded?
The demand for investigation stems from claims that Nehru's policies may have adversely affected India’s national security and foreign relations.