ED arrests 2 ex-Reliance Anil Ambani Group executives in ₹114.98 crore SBI fraud

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED arrests 2 ex-Reliance Anil Ambani Group executives in ₹114.98 crore SBI fraud

Synopsis

Three former senior executives of the Anil Ambani group are now in custody within weeks — the ED has arrested Sateesh Seth and Gautam Doshi under PMLA for an alleged ₹114.98 crore SBI fraud, even as the NCLT has initiated personal insolvency proceedings against Anil Ambani himself as a personal guarantor for loans worth hundreds of crores.

Key Takeaways

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested Sateesh Seth and Gautam Doshi , former directors of Reliance Telecom Ltd , under PMLA in Mumbai on 13 June .
The arrests stem from an alleged loan fraud of ₹114.98 crore at State Bank of India (SBI) , first probed by the CBI in March .
SBI was part of a consortium of 11 banks that sanctioned a ₹735 crore term loan to Reliance Telecom Ltd .
Earlier in June , the CBI arrested Amitabh Jhunjhunwala , former Group MD of Reliance Communications , over an alleged ₹2,929.05 crore SBI loss.
The NCLT admitted an SBI plea initiating personal insolvency proceedings against Anil Ambani as a personal guarantor for loans to RCOM and RITL .
Anil Ambani's spokesperson said the NCLT order will be challenged through appropriate legal remedies.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has arrested two former executives of the Reliance Anil Ambani Group under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Mumbai, officials confirmed on 13 June. The agency took transit remand of Sateesh Seth and Gautam Doshi, who previously served as directors of Reliance Telecom Ltd, in connection with an alleged bank loan fraud case.

Background of the Case

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had booked and raided the premises of both Seth and Doshi in March as part of its probe into an alleged loan fraud worth ₹114.98 crore at the State Bank of India (SBI). The ED is understood to have taken cognisance of the CBI complaint and is now independently investigating the roles of the two former executives in the bank loan fraud.

Seth previously served as Vice Chairman of Reliance Infrastructure and is to be produced before a Delhi court for further custody proceedings.

The Wider Loan Fraud Probe

According to the CBI, SBI was part of a consortium of 11 banks that had sanctioned a total ₹735 crore term loan facility to Reliance Telecom Ltd. The alleged fraud relates to the misuse of these funds, officials said.

This comes after the CBI, earlier in June, arrested Amitabh Jhunjhunwala, a former Group Managing Director of Reliance Communications, in connection with an alleged loss of ₹2,929.05 crore caused to SBI by the company. Jhunjhunwala was produced before a court following which the CBI formally arrested him. Notably, this marks a significant escalation — with three senior former executives of the Anil Ambani group now in custody within weeks.

NCLT Admits SBI Plea Against Anil Ambani

In a parallel development, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Thursday admitted a plea filed by SBI and initiated personal insolvency resolution proceedings against industrialist Anil Ambani in his capacity as a personal guarantor for loans extended to Reliance Communications (RCOM) and Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL).

Responding to the NCLT order, a spokesperson for Anil Ambani said the order, once available, would be reviewed by his legal team and challenged through appropriate legal remedies. 'Mr Ambani remains confident of vindicating his position before the appropriate forums,' the spokesperson added.

What Happens Next

With the ED now pursuing money laundering charges alongside the CBI's fraud investigation, legal proceedings are expected to intensify across multiple courts. The NCLT's insolvency proceedings against Ambani as a personal guarantor add another layer of financial and legal scrutiny to the group's already embattled position. All accused are entitled to due process and have not been convicted of any offence.

Point of View

Not just the lending irregularities. With three former senior executives arrested in weeks and the NCLT now opening personal insolvency proceedings against Anil Ambani himself, the legal net around the Reliance Anil Ambani Group is tightening on multiple fronts simultaneously. What is striking is the scale of alleged exposure: a ₹735 crore consortium loan and a separate ₹2,929.05 crore loss to SBI point to systemic governance failures, not isolated incidents. The critical question mainstream coverage underplays is what the banks' own due diligence looked like when these loans were sanctioned — accountability in a consortium fraud rarely stops at the borrower.
NationPress
30 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the ED arrest Sateesh Seth and Gautam Doshi?
The ED arrested Sateesh Seth and Gautam Doshi, former directors of Reliance Telecom Ltd, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in connection with an alleged loan fraud of ₹114.98 crore at the State Bank of India. The CBI had earlier booked and raided them in March as part of the same investigation.
What is the total loan amount at the centre of the Reliance Telecom fraud case?
SBI was part of a consortium of 11 banks that sanctioned a ₹735 crore term loan facility to Reliance Telecom Ltd. The alleged fraud of ₹114.98 crore relates to SBI's share of that consortium exposure, according to the CBI.
Who is Amitabh Jhunjhunwala and why was he arrested?
Amitabh Jhunjhunwala is a former Group Managing Director of Reliance Communications. The CBI arrested him earlier in June in connection with an alleged loss of ₹2,929.05 crore caused to the State Bank of India by the company in an alleged loan fraud.
What are the NCLT proceedings against Anil Ambani about?
The National Company Law Tribunal admitted a plea by SBI to initiate personal insolvency resolution proceedings against Anil Ambani in his capacity as a personal guarantor for loans extended to Reliance Communications (RCOM) and Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL). Ambani's spokesperson said the order will be challenged through appropriate legal remedies.
What is the difference between the CBI and ED cases in this matter?
The CBI is investigating the underlying bank loan fraud — the alleged misuse of sanctioned credit facilities. The ED's PMLA case runs in parallel, focusing on the money laundering angle — tracing and attaching proceeds of the alleged fraud. Both agencies can pursue their investigations simultaneously under Indian law.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 4 weeks ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google