Did the ED Seize Rs 15.47 Crore Property of Delta Limited?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- ED Provisional Attachment: Rs 15.47 crore in properties seized.
- Legal Framework: Actions taken under PMLA.
- Impact on Workers: Approx. 800 employees affected.
- Misuse of Funds: Allegations of non-payment of PF dues.
- Corporate Governance: Importance of compliance with labor laws.
Kolkata, July 25 (NationPress) - The Enforcement Directorate (ED) from the Kolkata Zonal Office has provisionally attached immovable properties valued at Rs 15.47 crore linked to Delta Limited and others, as per the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), an official disclosed on Friday.
The properties were seized on July 23, and a final prosecution complaint was filed against Delta Limited and seven additional parties on July 24 in a special PMLA court in Kolkata.
According to the agency, the investigation was triggered by an FIR lodged at the Hare Street Police Station, Kolkata, following directives from the Calcutta High Court. This FIR alleged that statutory dues, including Provident Fund (PF), were not paid despite regular salary deductions. The FIR implicated Delta Limited and others for alleged criminal conspiracy, cheating, and misappropriation of workers’ provident fund contributions.
As per ED, the investigation revealed that around 800 workers associated with Delta Limited were cheated through the misuse of their Provident Fund Trust (Delta Jute and Industries Ltd Worker’s Provident Fund Trust).
The company was granted an exemption under the EPF Act, permitting it to manage PF funds via its trust. This trust was supposed to operate independently for the employees' benefit by wisely investing their PF contributions. However, in violation of this mandate, employees were appointed as trustees instead of professionals or fund managers, as stated by the ED.
The report indicated that these employees acted solely under management directives, lacking genuine control. Due to ongoing rule violations and financial losses, the exemption was revoked in 2014.
Even after the revocation and during ongoing litigation, the company continued to deduct PF from workers’ salaries but failed to deposit it either in the trust or with the PF authorities, wrongfully retaining the funds. The company intentionally avoided depositing the statutory contributions deducted from the employees.
According to the ED, the withheld amounts were laundered and utilized for unauthorized purposes, including loan repayments, covering business expenses, and property transactions.
The total proceeds of crime in this case amount to Rs 15.47 crore. The ED emphasized that the provisional attachment of the complete proceeds of crime in the form of immovable properties has been executed, and a final prosecution complaint has been lodged.