Was CM Vijayan’s Son Summoned by the ED?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Vivek Kiran has been summoned by the ED in a money-laundering investigation.
- The summons relates to the Life Mission housing project.
- Allegations of kickbacks totaling Rs 4.4 crore have surfaced.
- The ED's actions raise questions about political accountability.
- The case remains open despite Vivek's absence.
Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 11 (NationPress) A new controversy has emerged in Kerala as documents have come to light revealing that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) summoned Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s son, Vivek Kiran, regarding the Life Mission money-laundering investigation.
This revelation coincided with Chief Minister Vijayan’s meeting with Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Delhi, infusing a palpable political tension into the situation.
As reported by a prominent regional daily, the ED issued summons No. KCCEDO/2023/769 to Vivek Kiran, son of Pinarayi Vijayan, at Cliff House, Thiruvananthapuram, under Sections 50(2) and 50(3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The notice, endorsed by then ED Assistant Director P.K. Anand, instructed him to appear at the agency’s Kochi office at 10:30 a.m. on February 14, 2023, and to bring documents such as Aadhaar, PAN, bank statements, and details pertaining to his and his family’s assets.
However, Vivek failed to present himself to the agency, and no subsequent action was taken.
The document remains active on the ED's official 'Verify Your Summons' portal, affirming its legitimacy.
This summons is part of the inquiry into the Wadakkanchery Life Mission housing project, where the agency alleged kickbacks totaling Rs 4.4 crore.
The project, financed by the UAE Red Crescent for victims of the 2018 floods, was executed by Unitac Builders.
Allegations surfaced that Unitac Managing Partner Santosh Eapen paid bribes to consulate officials and M. Sivasankar, then Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister, who was later arrested following a three-day interrogation in Kochi.
The ED also questioned Swapna Suresh and Sarith, both implicated in the gold smuggling case, as part of the ongoing investigation.
The agency sought information about Vivek’s employment in Abu Dhabi from UAE authorities, though the outcome remains unclear.
During this time, the Congress alleged that the BJP and CPI(M) were “colluding” to protect the Chief Minister’s family, pointing to the ED’s inaction on the summons.
The emergence of this document raises new questions about the agency's reticence and the political ramifications of an investigation that briefly touched the Chief Minister.
Meanwhile, ED officials remain tight-lipped about the summons to Vivek, although they confirm that the case is still open.