Did ED File a Prosecution Complaint Against the Surat Crime Syndicate Under PMLA?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The ED's recent actions in Surat highlight its commitment to dismantling organized crime networks. With significant assets seized, the agency aims to deliver justice and curb illegal activities, making headlines across the nation. Stay tuned as this story unfolds!
Key Takeaways
- ED filed a Prosecution Complaint against Kothari and Sheikh.
- Over 30 properties attached under PMLA.
- Investigations reveal extensive criminal activities.
- Agency aims to disrupt organized crime operations.
- Ongoing investigations may uncover more assets.
New Delhi, Sep 6 (NationPress) The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Surat Sub-Zonal Office, has initiated a Prosecution Complaint (PC) before the Special Court (PMLA), Ahmedabad (Rural), targeting Sajid, known as Sajju Gulam Mohammad Kothari, the purported leader of the infamous “Sajju Gulam Mohammad Kothari Gang,” along with his close associate, Allarakha Ghulam Mustafa Sheikh.
The ED's investigation was prompted by six FIRs lodged by Surat Police against Kothari and his gang members, which encompass a range of serious crimes such as extortion, murder, kidnapping, rioting, robbery, dacoity, illegal money lending, gambling, and property damage.
According to findings by the ED, Sajju Kothari, in collaboration with his associates, accrued proceeds of crime (POC) valued at Rs 4.30 crore through organized criminal activities, including extortion, fraud, and criminal conspiracy. The agency claims this illicit money was funneled into acquiring real estate and reinvested to maintain and expand the gang's illegal operations.
In a previous operation, the ED provisionally seized 31 properties worth approximately Rs 4.21 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. These assets were registered under the names of Sajju Kothari, Allarakha Sheikh, and other associates.
In the recent Prosecution Complaint, the ED has sought the Special Court's order to confiscate these attached assets.
“The ED has previously provisionally attached 31 immovable properties valued at Rs. 4.21 Crore under PMLA, 2002, held by Sajid @ Sajju Gulam Mohammad Kothari, Allarakha Gulam Mustafa Sheikh, and others, and has requested their confiscation in the Prosecution Complaint submitted to the Ld. Special Court, Ahmedabad,” the agency stated in its press release.
This action represents a crucial step in intensifying the crackdown on organized crime in Surat, a region plagued by gang activities for several years.
Officials noted that by targeting both the financial resources and tangible assets of the gang, the agency aims to incapacitate its operations.
The ED further disclosed that its investigation remains ongoing to uncover additional assets and money laundering connections related to Kothari's criminal syndicate.
Point of View
This decisive action by the ED reflects a strong commitment to uphold the rule of law. It serves as a warning to criminal syndicates that the authorities are relentless in their pursuit of justice, reinforcing the nation's trust in governance and law enforcement.
NationPress
22/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the PMLA?
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is an Indian law aimed at preventing money laundering and ensuring that illegal proceeds are confiscated.
Who is Sajju Gulam Mohammad Kothari?
Sajju Gulam Mohammad Kothari is alleged to be the leader of a notorious crime syndicate involved in various criminal activities, including extortion and murder.
What actions has the ED taken against Kothari?
The ED has filed a Prosecution Complaint and provisionally attached multiple properties linked to Kothari under PMLA.
Why is this case significant?
This case is significant as it represents a concerted effort by law enforcement to combat organized crime and money laundering in India.
What are the potential consequences for Kothari and his associates?
If found guilty, Kothari and his associates could face severe legal repercussions, including imprisonment and asset confiscation.
