Srinagar court sentences ex-terrorist Ghulam Dar to life imprisonment for 2020 murder
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A court in Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, on Monday, 10 August sentenced former militant Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Dar to rigorous life imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000 for the murder of Abdul Gani Dar — a 2020 case registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) at Police Station Maisuma. The conviction, secured by Srinagar Police, closes a case that carried the full weight of a violent militant past.
Who Is Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Dar
Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Dar, son of Abdul Gani Dar, is a resident of Bichwara, Dalgate, Srinagar and a founding member of Tehreek-ul-Mujahideen (TuM) — a proscribed outfit linked to the Jamiat-e-Ahl-e-Hadith movement in Kashmir. During his years of active militancy, he was involved in grenade attacks, assaults on security checkpoints, weapon-snatching, and the targeted killing of civilians and security personnel.
He also reportedly provided logistical support and maintained operational links with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizb-ul-Mujahideen (HM) through the 2000s, before his arrest. The murder conviction pertains to the killing of Abdul Gani Dar, son of Mohd. Abdullah, a resident of Rassu, Budgam, as documented in FIR No. 03/2020.
How the Case Was Built
Srinagar Police described the conviction as the result of a meticulous investigation backed by scientific evidence and diligent prosecution before the court. Investigators pursued the case through standard due process, treating the accused's militant background as no bar to criminal accountability.
Notably, this is a rare instance where a former militant faces a full criminal trial and life sentence for a post-militancy offence — distinct from the more common security-law detentions that have historically characterised J&K's legal landscape.
What Srinagar Police Said
In an official statement, Srinagar Police said the outcome 'demonstrates that an individual's past association with militancy does not place them beyond the reach of the law, and that serious criminal offences are pursued through due process irrespective of the accused's background.' The force added that it 'remains steadfast in its commitment to upholding the rule of law, ensuring justice for victims and bringing offenders to justice in accordance with law.'
Significance of the Verdict
The case signals a broader institutional posture in J&K: that former militants who re-enter civilian life are subject to the same legal framework as any other citizen. Critics of the region's security apparatus have long argued that militant-linked crimes often go unprosecuted due to evidentiary gaps or political sensitivities. This conviction, grounded in civilian criminal law rather than special security statutes, offers a different model. The verdict is expected to send a clear message to others with militant histories who may believe past affiliations provide a degree of legal insulation.