Is A for Akhilesh? FIR Filed Against SP Leaders for Involving Children in Protest

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Grassroots education initiatives can significantly influence political discourse.
- The impact of school mergers on marginalized communities is a critical concern.
- Political messaging in education raises questions about pedagogical integrity.
- The role of government in shaping educational access is under scrutiny.
- Public awareness and resistance can shape the future of educational policy.
Bhadohi, Aug 1 (NationPress) In Uttar Pradesh, a grassroots education initiative spearheaded by the Samajwadi Party has sparked a significant political and legal discourse regarding the influence of ideology within educational settings.
Dubbed 'PDA Pathshaalas', these informal community schools were established in reaction to the state government's plans to merge numerous low-enrolment government institutions.
This situation triggered an inquiry, resulting in an FIR against Saroj and others under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
A departmental probe has also been launched against Assistant Education Officer Ramakant Singroul for purported negligence.
While the BJP-led government claims that these mergers aim to enhance resource efficiency and educational results, the SP argues that this strategy disproportionately impacts children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
The PDA Pathshaala concept, initially proposed in Saharanpur's Ramnagar by SP activist Faraz Alam Gada, intertwines basic education with political themes. Students learn the English alphabet using names of political and social figures associated with the party's ideology - A for Akhilesh, B for Babasaheb Ambedkar, C for Chaudhary Charan Singh, D for Dimple Yadav, and M for Mulayam Singh Yadav.
Gada asserts that the curriculum is crafted to cultivate early awareness of social justice and democratic principles.
He contends that the BJP's school merger policy is a deliberate effort to diminish educational access for the impoverished, thereby stifling future dissent.
The controversy escalated in Bhadohi district when SP leader Anjani Saroj reportedly organized a protest involving schoolchildren recently moved to an Anganwadi center.
Officials say Saroj handed out stationery and sweets before leading the children back to their original school while displaying SP banners.
Although SP chief Akhilesh Yadav has praised the PDA Pathshaala initiative as a moral triumph, Basic Education Minister Sandeep Singh clarified that no schools have been permanently closed and that mergers can be reversed if they lead to discomfort.
He assured the public that sanctioned positions remain unchanged and that the initiative is meant to improve learning conditions, not dismantle them.
The PDA Pathshaala project provokes broader inquiries into the politicization of education and the future of public schooling in India.
Whether regarded as a protest or a parallel educational model, it highlights the intensifying conflict between state policies and grassroots opposition in shaping the educational framework.
In May, the Chhattisgarh government announced plans to rationalize over 10,000 schools, a move that could result in the elimination of approximately 43,000 positions.