Is There an FIR Against Islamic Cleric for Insulting Dimple Yadav?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A recent FIR filed against Islamic cleric Maulana Sajid Rashidi for his derogatory remarks about MP Dimple Yadav has sparked outrage. This incident raises significant concerns about misogyny and communal harmony in society. Read on to learn more about this developing situation and its implications.
Key Takeaways
- FIR filed against Maulana Sajid Rashidi for derogatory remarks.
- Comments deemed inflammatory and misogynistic.
- Complaint initiated by SP leader Pravesh Yadav.
- Legal sections invoked include anti-women remarks.
- Widespread condemnation from political and public spheres.
Lucknow, July 28 (NationPress) The Lucknow Police have lodged an FIR against Islamic cleric Maulana Sajid Rashidi for purportedly making offensive, inflammatory, and misogynistic comments directed at Samajwadi Party (SP) leader and Lok Sabha MP Dimple Yadav.
The controversial remarks were made during his appearance on a television channel and various public forums.
The complaint was submitted on Saturday by SP leader Pravesh Yadav, a resident of Vikalp Khand in Gomtinagar, as confirmed by police late on Sunday.
In his written grievance, Yadav accused the cleric of making derogatory and indecent statements on media platforms that not only tarnished the personal dignity of a woman but also had the potential to incite religious and communal discord in society.
According to Pravesh Yadav, Maulana Sajid's remarks were not merely an affront to Dimple Yadav but an insult to all women.
"This has not only wounded the dignity of a woman, but every woman in society is impacted by such remarks. Such indecent and anti-women statements made from a public platform like a TV channel can disrupt social harmony," he asserted.
Deputy Commissioner of Police (East Zone) Shashank Singh confirmed that an FIR has been filed at Vibhutikhand police station under Sections 79 (outraging modesty of women), 196 (promoting enmity between groups), 299 (outraging religious sentiments), and 352 (intentional insult) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), along with Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.
The FIR was registered late on Sunday, and investigations are currently in progress.
The uproar began after Maulana Sajid Rashidi's comments during a televised debate, where he criticized MP Dimple Yadav for appearing in public without a head covering, followed by a derogatory remark that ignited widespread outrage.
This statement, aimed at the Mainpuri MP, received severe backlash from SP leaders and the general public alike.
The cleric's remarks were reportedly based on images from a Samajwadi Party meeting held at the Sansad Marg mosque in Delhi.
The meeting was attended by Dimple Yadav, SP chief Akhilesh Yadav, and MP Iqra Hasan. Rashidi’s comments on these images, which circulated on social media and news channels, led to a storm of criticism.
Numerous political parties and social organizations have denounced his statements, labeling them as anti-women and insensitive. They have also called for stringent legal action against the cleric for his remarks, which many perceive as not only regressive but also likely to incite communal tensions.
Point of View
We stand firmly against any remarks that belittle individuals based on their gender or personal choices. The controversy surrounding Maulana Sajid Rashidi's comments highlights the ongoing struggle for women's dignity in our society. We must advocate for a respectful dialogue that promotes understanding over division.
NationPress
10/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the FIR against Maulana Sajid Rashidi?
The FIR was filed due to his derogatory comments about Dimple Yadav, which were considered inflammatory and misogynistic.
Who filed the complaint?
The complaint was submitted by SP leader Pravesh Yadav.
What sections of law were invoked in the FIR?
The FIR includes Sections 79, 196, 299, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.
What was the reaction from the public and political parties?
The remarks have been widely condemned, with calls for legal action against the cleric for his anti-women statements.
What is the current status of the investigation?
The FIR was registered late on Sunday, and investigations are currently underway.
